|
February 27th, 2013
03:37 PM ET
Watch: Kristen Stewart explains 'Twilight' stutterIt took more than a pair of colored contacts to transform Kristen Stewart's "Twilight" character, Bella Swan, into the vampire Bella Cullen. As the 22-year-old actress explains in a special feature clip from the DVD/Blu-ray edition of the final "Twilight" installment, she had to ditch the quirks that came naturally to her in order to portray an assured, super-strong and speedy vamp.
"I've yet to play somebody who was a huge departure for me. I mean, to be completely still and controlled, and to know that your mind works faster," Stewart said of the character transition. "Being a clumsy person, it's not the easiest thing to do. The way I usually learn my lines is I learn the idea, which is why I stutter a lot in 'Twilight.'" Check out how Stewart adjusted to her new character in the clip above. "The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn - Part 2" will be released on Blu-ray, DVD, digital download and video on demand March 2.
« Previous entryAnne Hathaway apologizes to Valentino for Oscars Prada
 |
  About this blog
Our daily cheat-sheet for breaking celebrity news, Hollywood buzz and your pop-culture obsessions.  |
you can't fk with 49
camera through phone.
140,000 viewers-who cares-not impressed....
they must grasping onto straws trying too hold onto their husbands and boyfriends....please god even at my age when i get back into a relationship do NOT ever allow me to become them...never.
victory--told you she was going too hand it all too me.
for trappie not other.
*
Kristen needs better acting skills like kim kardashian
SHE TUFF....WONDER IF BOYFRIEND KNOWS 1/2 THIS STUFF....
is unappealing to everyone..just ignore her hacking azz–she's a useless pig.
alot of people do not find her appealing...she knows it i'm sure but she will not change.
Stop making me look bad!!
Never saw her act, but I'll watch her when Vivid signs her to her first movie!
That's not a forehead, that's a FIVEhead, LMFAO!
Why is Justin Beiber so pale? There's no lights in the closet!
"The way I usually learn my lines is I learn the idea, which is why I stutter a lot in 'Twilight.'"
Uh...what?
I heard she smelled like poop.
Alvarez that is an insult to poop. Stink nuggets smell way better than her!
Dear Pliny – stick a stick of feces in your mouthh and shuttup
because she has it. sure she made a couple of mistakes..but i've see far worse then that....
she makes a mistake and fixes....she certainly is not going too worry about judgmental people
who have no class....let's face folks this is 2013 and we don't have too take it.
she is talented and always working...most of these bloggers are jealous....best of luck Kristen
always working on what exactly...??
She is good looking, has ok talent, but yes no personality.
I know she let all her fans down when she pulled a Mariah
and slept with her manager guy but let's not hate her too bad.
The only reason she looked like a cracked out mumbler at the
Oscars was she most likely was on a ton of painkillers for a
injured foot.
You know what cracks me up. All these people posting that she has no talent. Yet she is constantly in movies that are on the big screen, making millions of dollars, and most of you probably work at gamestop lol
Yet here you are finding time to post on a forum in between acting in critically clamed movies.
She must have a good agent. She's a forgettable actress who's lucky enough to land some decent roles.
"I've yet to play somebody who was a huge departure for me."
Yup. Sign of a non-actress.
Talent – 5
Looks – 5
Personality – 0
I've enjoyed every movie I've seen that she has appeared in recently. I enjoyed all of the twilight movies. The Yellow Hankerchief was amazing and Welcome to the Rileys was compelling acting as well.
The girl has talent. And anyone that thinks she's not attractive has a valid opinion just like anyone else. But the numerous magazines and fashion blogs that show her in pictorial after pictorial as a glamour model would tend to disagree with you. She's beautiful.
Now as a person...yes I have some issues with her. She's slovenly and appears lazy much of the time...but I don't work 18+ hour days like she does. I wont judge her until walking in her shoes. My opinion she's pretty kewl.
She only has one facial expression. It's like her blood is made of Botox.
well that explains alot....i still like her acting better in the last 3 movies. The first one is awkward to watch now and now i know why. and kudos kristen for braving the Oscars on crutches!
So how does she explain the "twilight stutter"/mannerisms, lack of acting in all her other roles?
Oh wait.. she's not acting.. Look at her interviews on tv, same mannerisms as what we see on screen.
Can't. Act.
Not. Acting.
Just repeating lines.
How does anything she said explain her stutter?
"Sure, I'd love to come over & do a Twilight marathon with you"... said no straight guy ever.
thanks for the early morning giggle!
If it wasn't for daddy being an entertainment lawyer, nobody would have heard of her. She is the worst actress I have ever seen in movies. EVER. Name one that is worse. I dare you. And she's high all the time – which would be funny if she was competent and not a mean, awful human being.
Really? Know her that well personally, do you? And her father is not an entertainment lawyer, do your homework. She's been a working acress for years, and is stil highly sought-after, and this 40-something has seen too many movies to mention, and she (Kristen) does rather well, comparatively, to most acresses out today or previously. Keep your personal venom to yourself; it isnt constructive dialogue.
Pia Zadora.
Wrose actress??? Try Denise Richards as a Bond girl... if I had time... could come up with a list of worse actresses.
Her father worked in television as stage manager and producer, half-wit. He's not a lawyer.
Ya know, I haven't seen 1 of those Twilight movies yet. Yet? Prob never will.
You should consider yourself lucky. I myself had the misfortune of having had to watch 1 of them. Never again! 2 hours of the most mind numbingly boring d#@chebag bulls* t.
I've got to admit. I've never seen any of the Twilights, either. Just not my thing, I guess.
I thought she was good in the runaways with dakota fanning. Everything else, ehh..
I agree, she did do a good job as Joan Jett...but look at Joan Jett- not big on personality or emotion.
Funny how much commentary this bit of "news" stirred up. I think Anne Hathaway had a harder transformation.
how do you even compare anne hathaway to kristen stewart? anne chose projects that worked for her...and broke back mountain really gave the world a clue she can stop out of the awkward teen role and really shine. pretty effortless. i cant wait to see what anne does next.....and please dont tell me how great julia roberts is....she plays julia in evey movie...same charater...same mannerisms......meryl streep is the actress standard that any actress should hope to be....name another who comes close....anne is on her way...
Or, alternate explanation, she's a terrible actress who is super hot.
We will have to agree to disagree on her hotness. She is a disturbing mess in every way.
I think Kristen's a good actress, but if you've seen her other movies after twilight started , I have notice Bella Swan coming out in other characters.
"I have notice Bella Swan coming out in other characters"
That's because it's not Bella – it's Stewart. That's the only way she knows how to act – badly.
Ambrose was bein sarcastic btw
"The way I usually learn my lines is I learn the idea, which is why I stutter a lot in 'Twilight.'"........That does not make any sense...sorry.
I think she is the most overrated and unattractive popular actress there is.
And Julia Roberts and Jennifer Aniston are not the most overly rated "gorgeous" and "talented" women on the face of the planet! Never could figure out what the planet ever wanted to do with them to begin with as far as looks and talent go. To each their own.
I'm just trolling. : )
huh? talented and wonderful? Which films are you watching? While she is not as bad as some she certainly is no Audrey Hepburn.
She shouldn't have to explain. Her remarkable acting abilities will take her far.
was the previous comment a joke?
yep 🙂
She is just so talented and wonderful. I'll bet she is the next Audrey Hepburn. It's a shame she hasn't won an Oscar yet.