Blake Lively: Those nude pics are fake
June 1st, 2011
10:50 AM ET

Blake Lively: Those nude pics are fake

Photos claiming to be of a naked Blake Lively spread across the Web Tuesday, but a rep for the actress says they’re not really her.

According to Us Weekly, the images show a blonde woman taking photos of herself in the buff, but the 23-year-old “Gossip Girl” star’s rep says Lively hasn’t done such a thing.

"The photos of Blake Lively which have just surfaced on various websites including Perez Hilton and Zap2it are 100 percent fake," her rep tells Us. “Blake has never taken nude photos of herself.”

To top it off, she’s also pursuing “legal action against the publication which initially published these photographs and any other outlets that republish them in any manner,” her rep says.

You can next see (a clothed) Blake Lively when “Green Lantern” arrives in theaters June 17.

Filed under: Celebrities

soundoff (67 Responses)
  1. mystereo

    If they're not her, then there would be no reason for legal action. It's obviously her.j

    June 4, 2011 at 5:47 am | Report abuse |
  2. Joe

    So fake, she is threatening lawsuits. LOL. If they were fake, she wouldn't care.

    June 3, 2011 at 2:47 pm | Report abuse |
  3. timus

    totally not her. The girl in that pic looks like a crack hoe!!

    June 3, 2011 at 2:40 pm | Report abuse |
  4. Bob McSqubbles

    I wouldn't mind getting nekkid with her.

    June 2, 2011 at 6:38 pm | Report abuse |
  5. the_dude

    I don't get it. She is average looking and not especially better actress than any other tramp in hollywood. She must have some other special talent that gets all the directors and producers off. I wonder what that is.......

    June 2, 2011 at 2:56 pm | Report abuse |
  6. Instigator

    What's the big deal. She sees herself naked every day. She's attractive and I'd do her in a heartbeat but I'm not going to lose any sleep over it.

    June 2, 2011 at 11:24 am | Report abuse |
  7. charlie crack

    Leighton Meester is much hotter!

    June 2, 2011 at 7:59 am | Report abuse |
  8. Katy

    She is not the type of young woman to lower herself to that level just because she is attractive and happens to be in the acting business. Those of you who made nasty comments need to take your dirty words elsewhere better yet keep it to yourselves. Blake is a classy young lady & she has every right to pursue legal action against the person or persons reponsible for spreading this garbage around the web.

    June 1, 2011 at 7:28 pm | Report abuse |
  9. tom

    Good rubbin off material either way

    June 1, 2011 at 6:11 pm | Report abuse |
  10. The final answer

    I know they are real. Sarah Palin said so and she never lies, then Lance Armstrong called and backed it up. But what;s the big deal if they are? She's a talentless ho anyway. At least she's got a decent body to look at. Snooki sent me shots of her and I thought it was a pig roast.

    June 1, 2011 at 6:00 pm | Report abuse |
  11. Brian

    Its her! Even Jamie Foxx did it last year just to see what he looked like!

    June 1, 2011 at 5:55 pm | Report abuse |
  12. Fake

    Easily fake, look at the one where you see her face. Top of her head, hair and face are blurred but the bottom of her hair is not. Plus the cabinets in the back would be blurred too so yep these are fake as heck! Nice try though.

    June 1, 2011 at 5:29 pm | Report abuse |

    Thanks for deleting my posts CNN.

    June 1, 2011 at 5:23 pm | Report abuse |
  14. Annie

    You people are losers who cares even if it is her ....or if its not....really whoo cares either why it won't affect any of u.

    June 1, 2011 at 5:21 pm | Report abuse |
    • Captain Sarcastico

      You sure say "who cares" a lot for someone who obviously cares a LOT more than anyone else here.

      June 1, 2011 at 5:29 pm | Report abuse |
  15. Sunshine Girl *

    Female stars do this all the time. Especially when their fame star seems to be fading out. Just another way for stars to keep their name in the limelight. Then they deny it and drag the drama on even longer. Dumb fame mongers!

    June 1, 2011 at 4:57 pm | Report abuse |
  16. FU

    Fake 'ey? *fap fap fap*

    June 1, 2011 at 4:49 pm | Report abuse |
  17. vernon leigh

    That's her damn body show it IF that's what she want. Whomever it is.

    June 1, 2011 at 4:43 pm | Report abuse |
  18. David

    Hey you. Stop caring.

    June 1, 2011 at 4:05 pm | Report abuse |
  19. Fayt

    I haven't taken the time to check the picture but fake or not think about it, she has her new movie with Ryan airing in a few weeks. Coincidence? The timing seems a little to perfect if you ask me.

    June 1, 2011 at 3:31 pm | Report abuse |
  20. me

    That is if you can't play with the big dogs go get on the porch!

    June 1, 2011 at 3:22 pm | Report abuse |
  21. fernace

    All the little starlets pose nude at 1 point or another! Why deny?!? Nudity is such friggin prudity in this country! We're in the 21st century, not the 17th! Also, & this is a Big lesson for all playing around with their phone cameras, if you don't want it for public consumption, Don't take the pic! That goes for politicians, too. Very simple,logical& doable!

    June 1, 2011 at 3:05 pm | Report abuse |
  22. Barrens Chatter

    Yeah seriously, where da pictures at CNN? Give us a link!

    Did you hear that Sylvanas posed nude for Blizzard Boobs Magazine? OOOOOO LALA!

    June 1, 2011 at 2:43 pm | Report abuse |
  23. Matthew Posten

    Then I guess that the comprmising photographs of her with ABDULLAH THE BUTCHER are fake too............NOT

    June 1, 2011 at 2:00 pm | Report abuse |
  24. The Mad R@p3r

    Meh, fake or not its a pretty underwhelming self-shot. Take some photo classes honey.

    June 1, 2011 at 1:37 pm | Report abuse |
  25. Dan

    Is she claiming that's not her naked body and that someone superimposed her face on to that body? That's what "fake" means right? Good luck with that claim she's going to need it! Only delusional fans (see above) would say otherwise.

    June 1, 2011 at 1:32 pm | Report abuse |
  26. peacsktr

    Blakes face is longer and her chin is an oval type that pops out a bit, fake blake is way to round faced and those not have blakes chin. Fake Fake Love you Blake.

    June 1, 2011 at 1:17 pm | Report abuse |
    • peacsktr

      Lastly anyone who has a brain can search for blake pics on google or whatever and find tons of her pics in revealing outfits where you see her breast and no mole to be seen in the area where fake blake has hers

      June 1, 2011 at 1:23 pm | Report abuse |
  27. peacsktr

    Just saw the pics they are so fake the fake blake has the beauty mark on the wrong side of her face and her chin is so diffrent, also her cheeks are way to curved to be blake.

    June 1, 2011 at 1:14 pm | Report abuse |
  28. brian

    Sure looks like her to me!! Same body type and everything!

    June 1, 2011 at 1:07 pm | Report abuse |
    • Its a drive by

      She should take pity on us all and jump from the nearest highest building.

      June 1, 2011 at 1:10 pm | Report abuse |
    • lol

      Show us how it's done Its a Driveby. We'd like a demonstration from you first.

      June 1, 2011 at 3:36 pm | Report abuse |
  29. cody

    if somebody did that to me? i would sue the hell outta them too!!!!!

    June 1, 2011 at 1:06 pm | Report abuse |
    • LOL

      Don't worry, no one wants to post your nude pics doe the world to see. I promise.

      June 1, 2011 at 3:35 pm | Report abuse |
  30. right never

    them republicans all be ruining this place

    June 1, 2011 at 12:57 pm | Report abuse |
  31. Richard

    I don't know what the consternation is about. Honestly, how many good-looking woman in showbiz DO we know who haven't posed nude at some point??

    June 1, 2011 at 12:20 pm | Report abuse |
  32. Kristina

    @John: there are other things to sue for besides copyright violation. Some options might be defamation, invation of privacy, false light, etc.

    June 1, 2011 at 12:18 pm | Report abuse |
  33. dumbapes

    Who gives a crap? This chick is another one that will die of the super aids

    June 1, 2011 at 12:05 pm | Report abuse |
    • Barney Rubble

      Yeah you've seen one nekkid hot chick you pretty much wanna see them all!!!! That's why we care...

      June 1, 2011 at 5:19 pm | Report abuse |
  34. Goodegyptian

    That's not her. Seriously people come on!! It's not her!!

    June 1, 2011 at 11:57 am | Report abuse |
  35. John

    Uh, if the pics aren't of her, then she doesn't have any copyright ownership and thus no grounds to sue if reported, no?

    June 1, 2011 at 11:56 am | Report abuse |
    • MG

      I do believe there's that whole defamation of character thing.

      June 1, 2011 at 12:42 pm | Report abuse |
    • CZNY

      Defamation is completely inaplicable and she cannot sue for that. There is a reasonable possibility that they are of her – and to prove defamation she would have to 1: prove they are not of her and 2: that the person posting the pictures had actual knowledge they were not of her. It would likey be impossible for her to prove either. Rather, her only grounds for suit is 1: copyright if the photos are her (she would lose for any news type websites) and 2: possibly a right to publicity (you can win lawsuits where the photo is designed to resemble a person if the photo is used for commercial purposes (not celeb news purposes) – e.g., Vanna White won a lawsuit against a Samsung add that had a robot resembling Vanna White).

      June 2, 2011 at 1:00 pm | Report abuse |
  36. sylvan finkelstein


    June 1, 2011 at 11:53 am | Report abuse |
    • Fred Flintstone

      "You can lead a gift horse to water...but don't look at his teeth!" –ARCHIE BUNKER

      June 1, 2011 at 5:18 pm | Report abuse |
  37. yeah_right

    If the photos aren't of Lively, why does she feel a need to "take legal action," hmm?

    After looking at them, I'd say her primary concerns are the photography sux, the poses are trite, and that "hot bod" isn't as hot as she needs everyone to think it is.

    June 1, 2011 at 11:34 am | Report abuse |
    • AGREE

      SO TRUE!!!!

      June 1, 2011 at 7:24 pm | Report abuse |
    • Wzrd1

      If someone released fake pictures of ME sans apparel, I'd sue too.
      *I* want to make money off of them, not some moron who faked them!
      Regrettably, the EPA has forbidden publication of my body without a massive amount of clothing, due to ossification of those who have viewed it in the past.
      Remember Lot's wife? She saw me in a speedo...

      June 7, 2011 at 12:45 am | Report abuse |
  38. mapleoatmeal

    They are her. I did extensive research all night long, and the Octagon, James Westfall and Dr. Kenneth Noisewater concur with my findings.

    June 1, 2011 at 11:25 am | Report abuse |
  39. David

    here they are.

    June 1, 2011 at 11:12 am | Report abuse |
  40. David

    her rep is seriously claiming these aren't her??? yeah right. these are her right down to her silver iphone in a black case. 'she's never taken nude photos of herself'??? LOL. okay, rep.

    June 1, 2011 at 11:11 am | Report abuse |
  41. The Mad R@p3r

    Come on cnn, where's the link to the pics?

    June 1, 2011 at 11:03 am | Report abuse |

Post a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

About this blog

Our daily cheat-sheet for breaking celebrity news, Hollywood buzz and your pop-culture obsessions.