Kristen Stewart: 'Breaking Dawn' could be bloodier

Enough with the romance: Kristen Stewart is ready to bring out the gore.

The 21-year-old actress and star of the "Twilight: Saga" franchise told Entertainment Weekly that the oh-so-buzzed about "Breaking Dawn" birth scene isn’t as gruesome as she would have hoped.

“It’s funny because when [the PG-13 issue] comes up, everybody thinks it’s all about the sex,” Stewart said.

(For those who don’t know, the "Twilight" books contain both a honeymoon scene and a really, well, bloody pregnancy and birth. Stewart promises that the honeymoon part of the movie “feels like a real love scene, not necessarily vampire-y, which is good.”)

But back to the gore: Stewart said she thinks the birth scene is “really effective, and I’ve heard it really hits you in the face. But what it could have been? It could have been shocking and grotesque, because that’s how it was written in the book.”

The actress wistfully added, “I would have loved to have been puking up blood.”

Better luck next time, KStew. Director Bill Condon, however, assures Twihards that he still followed the storyline as closely as possible.

“We shot everything — whether it’s the lovemaking or the childbirth — as potent and powerful as it can be,” Condon told EW. “It will be interesting to see whether there will be people who think it too disturbing for this universe.”

See for yourself when “The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part I” arrives in theaters on November 18, with the second part bowing in November 2012.

Filed under: Celebrities • Kristen Stewart • movies • Twilight

soundoff (10 Responses)

charlie crack

Good riddance osama! Better luck phuckin w the US next time!

May 2, 2011 at 2:53 am | Report abuse | Log in to Reply
@N

she is so annoyin!!!she neva talks!!!wat a shy-a$$ed b!otch!!!!

May 1, 2011 at 9:15 pm | Report abuse | Log in to Reply
@N

i only lik twilight & i aint some superfan!!!& all those other vamp things is sh!t!!i only liked the 1st movie & all de others r sh!t & im hopin dis last 1 isnt.

May 1, 2011 at 6:23 pm | Report abuse | Log in to Reply
punk w no name

@N: you shut up. We don't need any more phucking vampire movies! You vampire lovers are more stupid than Justin Bieber fans!

May 1, 2011 at 6:14 am | Report abuse | Log in to Reply
@N

@your dad shut up!!!

April 30, 2011 at 2:17 pm | Report abuse | Log in to Reply
jam

BEST OF THE BEST.........WONDERFUL.......WE ARE WAITING FOR THAT APPEARING MOVIE........HEP HEP HURRY......WE LOVE U.....KRISTEN AND VAMPIRE LOVER.....

April 30, 2011 at 11:54 am | Report abuse | Log in to Reply
@N

kristen stewart is my fave actress!!!im a huge twilight fan & breaking dawn is my fave book eva!!!keep on going kristen!!!u inspire me to someday to become an actress(before i get old).

April 29, 2011 at 9:48 pm | Report abuse | Log in to Reply
- Your dad
  
  You're a d0uche
  
  April 30, 2011 at 11:03 am | Report abuse | Log in to Reply
what was the first part about again???

A year between movies?? I thought HP was bad.... A year is fine if it's separate books but to finish a story a year apart? Ridiculous.

April 29, 2011 at 5:07 pm | Report abuse | Log in to Reply
- whoa
  
  yea, real shocker, because NO other movie has Ever had a year's gap between their release dates
  
  April 29, 2011 at 7:54 pm | Report abuse | Log in to Reply

Kristen Stewart: 'Breaking Dawn' could be bloodier

soundoff (10 Responses)

Post a comment