New 'Blade Runner' movies on the way?
March 3rd, 2011
12:02 PM ET

New 'Blade Runner' movies on the way?

Alcon Entertainment is looking to acquire the rights to produce prequels and sequels to the 1982 cult classic "Blade Runner," according to the Hollywood Reporter.

The trade paper reports that the company is in final negotiations to potentially create a franchise around the movie, which was based on Philip K. Dick's "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep."

It was director Ridley Scott's follow-up to the box office smash "Alien," but it was considered a box office bomb at the time, only grossing $27.6 million, according to

In 1992, a Director's Cut - which removed the narration from star Harrison Ford, among other things - hit theaters, and the movie has since been considered one of the greatest sci-fi movies of all time. A "Final Cut" was released on DVD and Blu-Ray in 2007, the same year that the American Film Institute ranked it in its list of the 100 best films.

The more recent cuts especially left the resolution of the story up in the air, so this is probably not the first time a sequel has been pondered by fans and Hollywood execs alike.

In a statement to THR, Alcon Entertainment's Andrew Kosove and Broderick Johnson said, "We recognize the responsibility we have to do justice to the memory of the original with any prequel or sequel we produce. We have long-term goals for the franchise, and are exploring multi-platform concepts, not just limiting ourselves to one medium."

What do you think of this idea? Are you excited to see more "Blade Runner" or should the original stand on its own? Would you like to see Harrison Ford or Sean Young return to their roles? Comment below.

Filed under: movies

soundoff (128 Responses)
  1. dfarmer

    Sorry about the typographical and grammatical errors, but my disabilities sometime cause me to hit the wrong key and send out an email too soon. Hopefully, you understand what I tried to state. Thank you.

    March 17, 2011 at 9:48 pm | Report abuse |
  2. dfarmer

    Of course, make another movie that has the original actors (Harrison Ford, Sean Young) as they are now, if possible. No one can change the irst film because it stands alone. Just as those who criticized the sequel of Star Wars, Indiana Jones, Alien, etc., by using their OWN feelings without considering the vast majority of others that enjoyed ALL the sequels. It made the last Indiana Jones movie story line such a good one, precisely, because Indiana married the woman he really loved from the first movie.

    I really didn't know about movier re-makes until Turner Classic Movies started showing the first movie and the previous remakes. Each one was a masterpiece. Remember beauty and value is in the eye of the beholder!

    March 17, 2011 at 9:33 pm | Report abuse |
  3. dave

    i still can't believe how poorly recieved bladerunner was when it first hit the screens.i was the only kid in school who loved it.brilliant visionary haunting masterpiece of a movie.i would like to return to that world but i fear they won't be able to recapture the same magical feel.

    March 15, 2011 at 6:53 am | Report abuse |
  4. lance

    no... not possible. Horrible. Please God, no

    March 6, 2011 at 12:12 pm | Report abuse |
  5. pb

    oh boy there they go again is nothing sacred

    March 6, 2011 at 8:41 am | Report abuse |
  6. Jason

    I'm all for it if they respect the original. Don't want to see another Jar Jar Binks blunder...also, it wouldn't make sense to bring Shawn Young back because skin jobs don't age.

    March 4, 2011 at 11:34 pm | Report abuse |
  7. Iris

    Leave it alone. They made a great movie, but it bore only a passing resemblance to the story it was based on. Anything added at this point is strictly for the bucks. Find something new to do. You might be able to expand on the concept, but don't label it either a prequel or a sequel.

    March 4, 2011 at 4:15 pm | Report abuse |
  8. GuitarHarry

    Here's a thought: try coming up with an ORIGINAL IDEA for a story!

    March 4, 2011 at 3:42 pm | Report abuse |
  9. Gene Winfield

    Im very interested in seeing how this turns out since I built the cars from the origonal movie.

    March 4, 2011 at 2:30 pm | Report abuse |
  10. Pliny

    And another thing....Highlander was crapola.

    This is not an's just pure fact.

    Deal with it.

    March 4, 2011 at 12:06 pm | Report abuse |
  11. Pliny

    "We are exploring multi-platform concepts".

    Sounds like jargon to me. Sounds like some hacks who want to make $$$ from other people's success.

    Oh...and Deckard *IS* a replicant! Harrison Ford proved that later on in life...when his acting skills degraded to the point where he was nothing but another prop on the set.

    March 4, 2011 at 12:04 pm | Report abuse |
  12. 4Corners87401

    Let the original – with the voice over – stand! That is the best version, and the classic that I loved from the get-go! I don't mind the director's version but if you didn't watched the original with the voice-over – it makes very little sense. And I don't buy in that Decker is a Replicant. He might be a cold fish, but he isn't a Replicant.
    This is my all-time favorite movie. Top of the list! A visually stunning, fantastic, original movie classic! Leave it alone!

    March 4, 2011 at 10:43 am | Report abuse |
  13. Just Say No

    Coming to a theater near you....

    Battle of the century

    Starring Sean Connery as papa Smurf
    and Linsday Lohan as Smurfette.

    March 4, 2011 at 10:42 am | Report abuse |
  14. Chris McCoy

    If the sequel and prequel answer some interesting questions. (Is Dekard a replicant?)(Are there more replicants that have no expiration date?)(Are the skin jobs really human?) It could be an interesting journey. If they turn it into an action adventure to show guys flipping through the air and firing two guns with a car chase, it will suck so bad it will become a singularity and eat us all. This will work if it is more of a battlestar glactica cylon-living-among-us feel. We'll see. Frankly it might be better to not sell the rights and risk ruining one of the best movies ever made.

    March 4, 2011 at 10:42 am | Report abuse |
  15. LightnnRod

    Still NOOOO!!!!

    We did not need the Final Cut. Arguably the best version of Blade Runner is the one that was tested prior to the theatrical cut. It was Scott's raw work and, as is often the case, the energy, creativity, and energy rule.

    How could any sequel, prequel, or otherwise add a thing to this great film? The movie stands alone, asking more questions than it answers. Do we want to be told someone else's answers, or are our own answers, and lack thereof, sufficient?

    March 4, 2011 at 10:36 am | Report abuse |
  16. SeanNJ

    I don't care if they make prequels or sequels, because even if they're horrible, IT TAKES NOTHING AWAY FROM THE ORIGINAL!!!

    Is "The Matrix" any worse for having been followed by Reloaded and Revolutions? No. Just watch the first one.
    Is "Highlander" any less awesome because the sequels, and IMHO the TV show, wrecked the timeline? No. Just watch the first one.

    This is the equivalent of arguing that the Mona Lisa becomes less of an art piece every time someone makes a bad copy of it.

    March 4, 2011 at 10:33 am | Report abuse |
    • Meh

      Opinion noted and rejected – just because a thing can be done doesnt mean it should be.

      March 4, 2011 at 10:37 am | Report abuse |
  17. voicomp

    i loved the original and would go to see at least one or two offshoots/prequels/sequels but can't imagine they could approach the awesomeness of the original.

    March 4, 2011 at 10:32 am | Report abuse |
  18. Meh

    cripes...dont do it, just dont – isnt there another vampire or stuporhero that could be on the big screen...oh wait, yeah that idea sucks too.
    I guess nobody has any true vision anymore.

    March 4, 2011 at 10:28 am | Report abuse |
  19. LightnnRod








    A THOUSAND TIMES NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    March 4, 2011 at 10:26 am | Report abuse |
  20. Allen

    Please, not another Highlander II
    Please make whoever is pitching this idea for Blade Runner watch Highlander II as a case study of what a poorly thought out sequel can do to the memory of a good movie.

    March 4, 2011 at 10:16 am | Report abuse |
  21. Bill

    Ugh. No. That movie stands alone just fine. No need to trot out a sequel and a franchise 30 years later.

    Let's talk about Michel Gondry's proposed adaptation of "Ubik" and how awesome that would be.

    March 4, 2011 at 10:12 am | Report abuse |
  22. tim

    I'm okay with it as long as it doesn't suck. Seems like it probably will though. Alien and Blade Runner set the tone for damn near every sci-fi movie made since.

    March 4, 2011 at 10:04 am | Report abuse |
  23. Bubba


    March 4, 2011 at 10:02 am | Report abuse |
  24. JB

    Yeah, they need to add more explosions, giant robots, and more brain numbing "dialogue" by chicks in skimpy outfits (Megan Fox, here's some work for ya!). Over the top CGI, and of course, 3-D, its gotta be 3-D. WINNER!!!! Can't wait. Really....

    March 4, 2011 at 9:59 am | Report abuse |
  25. TommyK

    Obviously, this could be a mess. However, I will not poo poo the idea immediately. The original won't be harmed (at least in my mind) much like After-MASH had no effect on MASH. The Blade Runner story is rich enough to handle some off-shoots. Also, i like the idea of "other media". I played a PC Blade Runner game that was very satisfying, not much action but lots of investigation - like the movie.

    March 4, 2011 at 9:59 am | Report abuse |
  26. dc4sense

    Its too bad Hollywood doesn't consult SciFi readers for their ideas. There are SO MANY stories out there that could make great movies....alas alot of them are for thinking people – which may turn hollywood types off....

    March 4, 2011 at 9:50 am | Report abuse |
  27. MC

    I also heard they're going to have a painting elephant take a crack at redoing the Sistine Chapel. There is NO WAY these people will do that classic justice! Leave it alone.

    March 4, 2011 at 9:43 am | Report abuse |
  28. Jebby

    I think if they did it from one of the sequel novels it might be bad.. haters please read this wiki excerpt:

    "Three novels intended to serve as sequels to both Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? and Blade Runner have been published: Blade Runner 2: The Edge of Human (1995), Blade Runner 3: Replicant Night (1996), Blade Runner 4: Eye and Talon (2000). The official and authorized novels were written by Philip K. Dick's friend, K. W. Jeter. They continue the story of Rick Deckard and attempt to resolve many of the differences between the novel and the film."

    Of note: "were written by Philip K. Dick's friend, K. W. Jeter"

    March 4, 2011 at 9:39 am | Report abuse |
  29. mizzdirekt

    Tron sucked. It was like sitting in a video game for too long. I had headaches and eye problems for weeks afterwards. It was a giant instant gratification fest. There is no thought in these new movies, and the scripts (which is way more important than special effects) are horrible because people have no patience anymore for anything. Hollywood is very much in the middle of that argument as well. Stop teaching your audience to be impatient and develop a decent original classic.

    March 4, 2011 at 9:33 am | Report abuse |
  30. JB21

    Some folks know this, there's a sequel to the Blade Runner novel.

    March 4, 2011 at 9:21 am | Report abuse |
  31. Chiz

    I wait 20 years for Tron to come out, which is awesome by the way. don't be so heisitant to see what is made of bladerunner, it may turn out to be a great movie, and if not, it doesnt take away from the original. I would watch it, and so wouls all of you who are posting on here not to do it, so let hollywood make the decision, and enjoy what they make, or dont and possibly miss out on a great movie, thats up to you

    March 4, 2011 at 9:18 am | Report abuse |
  32. Going Batty


    March 4, 2011 at 9:15 am | Report abuse |
  33. Mike

    Nothing is too sacred to try again, but Blade Runner was a masterpiece. Remember, Scott was working this project while America was watching Buck Rogers with Erin Grey in spandex and little Twiki the robot. Even Star Wars went all cyber-cutsey with *Muppets* (RUFKM). Ridley Scott treated cyber-cutsey with utter contempt. Blade Runner had a very very different view of the future, one that resonates shockingly well 30 years later. Any "remake" is nothing more than homage, because the original was all about being unorthodox, about considering a future that looks nothing like "prevailing wisdom". The original is it's own monument.

    March 4, 2011 at 9:04 am | Report abuse |
  34. Snacklefish

    I think some of the cult love for the original hinges on the special effects used at the time. Now it'd be all CGI, no bluescreen or models. IF they made the other movies like the first, same techniques for SFX I think it'd stand up.

    See also: Star Wars prequel trilogy SFX vs. original trilogy

    March 4, 2011 at 9:02 am | Report abuse |
  35. Aggie's_OM

    Then what? Blade Runner the musical? Blade Runner on ice?

    Please. Let the original stand – alone.

    March 4, 2011 at 9:02 am | Report abuse |
  36. SithMonkey

    Alex, I'll take "Why" for $400

    March 4, 2011 at 8:01 am | Report abuse |
  37. johnnyboy

    I'd much rather have artists recreate or re-envision the Mona Lisa. On that note why don't we all just "re-envision" Michelangelo's David? That piece is even missing part of an arm. At the very least they should attach a prosthesis.
    Hollywood should support original stories. I'm tired of refreshed TV shows, Movies and movie scripts. Please encourage originality!

    March 4, 2011 at 7:52 am | Report abuse |
  38. Palm Coast Guy

    PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE don't let them do this!

    March 4, 2011 at 7:42 am | Report abuse |
  39. James

    People keep asking for original stories......I once saw an interview with a writer in which he claimed there were only something like 5 to 10 (I forget the exact number) basic storylines and everything ever written was just a version of one or more of those. What makes a story quality is how well you tell that basic storyline because at the end of the day there is nothing original left to say.

    March 4, 2011 at 7:00 am | Report abuse |
  40. sarahosmith

    retailme not and printapons saves me lots of time and money and more than that it make the online shopping lot more fun when you get discount!!

    March 4, 2011 at 6:32 am | Report abuse |
  41. TheLurkingBat

    They should do something more original, like "Does Hollywood Dream Of A Franchise Without Sequels?"

    March 4, 2011 at 6:28 am | Report abuse |
  42. chaz

    okay, if vangelis comes back in, maybe I can consider it....but maybe....

    March 4, 2011 at 6:07 am | Report abuse |
  43. chaz

    leave it alone. it's a pre or sequel would do it justice. I can't see ridley or pkd (rip) wanting to get involved with another film related to it. BLADE RUNNER rocks, even 29 yrs later!!!!

    March 4, 2011 at 6:06 am | Report abuse |
  44. DAISHI


    You can't make a sequel to Blade Runner. The heart of this movie has nothing to do with technology or guns or computers, it's about what makes human human. That last scene with Roy perched over his hunter is not about prey versus predator it's about a human being whose humanity showed the same sort of sympathies you'd expect of a robot, while the android shows all that's so human about itself. You don't sequel that. There's no sequel to the book that Philip K. Dick wrote, I appreciate that there were attempts to write sequels by his friend, but the science fiction master did not make those.

    March 4, 2011 at 5:10 am | Report abuse |
  45. johnny33405

    actually the original was so superior to many movies and especially to sci fi movies as it contained so many
    elements that most sci fis do not. it was very dark and noirish for a sci fi at time and threw a lot of movie goers i think.
    tech and medicine (i.e. robotics and genetics have come of age finally too).
    Anyone would have to work hard to screw up a prequel or sequel to this.
    It has been long enough too for audience to get past another star taking place of or sidestepping Harrison Ford as well.

    March 4, 2011 at 4:09 am | Report abuse |
  46. Kevin

    So why don't we get a "franchise" for movies like "Night of The Comet", "Spacehunter: Adventures In The Forbidden Zone", or "Buckaroo Banzai"? This trend of "reboots" or "reimaginings" is simply dreadful. I don't believe Hollywood could muster the creative mojo required to even attempt to do a prequel to "Blade Runner".

    March 4, 2011 at 12:39 am | Report abuse |
  47. Phoenix3

    It's official all creativity has been confirmed to have died in Hollywood, the results of the pending autopsy will be released to the public in a matter of weeks. When only remakes seem to be getting made and aimless sequels that RARELY are good let alone better than the original are the only movie options, going to the movies and spending half your paycheck just ain't happening anymore for alot of people. Blade Runner is a classic, leave it alone and please stop putting out movies that no one will want to watch look at Star Wars Episodes 1 – 3, no where near the level of IV, V and VI, George Lucas should have stopped at VI.

    March 4, 2011 at 12:36 am | Report abuse |
  48. Calvin Hobbes

    I thought remakes were the pits until I saw JJ Abrams Star Trek, then I decided they may not be that bad. So long as none of the original actors appear in it, making it look like a geriatric reunion, it might have a chance.

    March 3, 2011 at 11:55 pm | Report abuse |
  49. Phil

    As long as they have Vangelis write the music – it'll be great.

    March 3, 2011 at 11:51 pm | Report abuse |
  50. Janet

    There will never be a blade runner sequel - because the original movie was funded by 3 different companies. They each contributed roughly the same amount of money.

    The first company got the distribution rights in the US - lost money big time because it was a box office bomb at the time. The second company got the international distribution rights - lost money big time as well. The third company (who contributed the final dollars to finish the over-budgeted movie) got the video rights - made tons of money with VHS and DVD sales worldwide.

    The third company always wanted to create blade runner sequels - but the other 2 companies lost so much money 30 years ago that they have always demanded a king's ransom in order for them to agree to any sequel deals.

    March 3, 2011 at 11:28 pm | Report abuse |
  51. P

    They way Hollywood and the world works now – if it made money once – try it again.

    March 3, 2011 at 11:22 pm | Report abuse |
  52. Jason Glugla

    As Roy Batty said in that classic scene "time to die".

    March 3, 2011 at 11:19 pm | Report abuse |
    • Mongoose

      Sorry Jason..Is was not Roy that said it. It was Leon.....god I'm such a nerd for knowing that!

      March 4, 2011 at 6:43 am | Report abuse |
    • Mongoose

      Ya know, now that I think about it, he DID say the end. Sorry Jason.

      March 4, 2011 at 6:48 am | Report abuse |
  53. r

    Blade Runner vs. Sling Blade vs. Blade Quad

    March 3, 2011 at 11:05 pm | Report abuse |
  54. Noooo!!!! Get doooown! Get to the choppaaaa!!!

    You know what's sad? Nobody listens. They're still gonna try to do this. I mean it's stupid! A sequel to Blade Runner? There's no way they'd pull it off with Harrison Ford, no matter how good the makeup, FX, or whathaveyou. Just look at the goatscrew that was Indy 4. And Sean Young? Are you kidding? What's the last notable movie she was in? Ace-Freaking-Ventura, as the sausage-hiding gender-bending villain like 20 years ago! For fks sake, make something original, Hollywood. You've done it before. Don't you remember?

    March 3, 2011 at 11:05 pm | Report abuse |
  55. FlordiaDave

    I really hope Ridley Scott becomes involved. It will be almost impossible to maintain the style of the tale without him.

    March 3, 2011 at 11:01 pm | Report abuse |

    I would at least give it a chance. It has always been one of my favorite movies.

    March 3, 2011 at 10:54 pm | Report abuse |
  57. Jo

    This will go the way of the GWTW remake. Someone in charge will eventually wake up and bag this. Talk about electric sheep.

    March 3, 2011 at 10:53 pm | Report abuse |
  58. Sir Osis of Liver

    There are very few movies that can grab your imagination the way that Blade Runner does. For me, it stands alone as a classic / awsome / great / compelling movie. I do not need or want any more information about the story than I already have. Make your prequals or sequals if you wish. I will not watch them. I do not wish to have my own dreams changed in any way. The things I have seen in this movie are enough for me.

    March 3, 2011 at 10:40 pm | Report abuse |
  59. Crazy Larry

    Sean Young and Harrison Ford? What will they do? Take out each others' false teeth and gum it?

    March 3, 2011 at 10:37 pm | Report abuse |
  60. The Chucker

    Really, a franchise? Seems just to be a way to sell my kids Deckard lunchboxes and Gaff origami kits.

    March 3, 2011 at 10:21 pm | Report abuse |
  61. HarshReality

    If you want to do some good SciFi, bring Firefly back. That was an amazingly well done show. Kudos to Josh W!!!

    March 3, 2011 at 10:16 pm | Report abuse |
  62. HarshReality

    Any excuse for a well done (provided it IS well done) science fiction movie is a good excuse.

    March 3, 2011 at 10:14 pm | Report abuse |
  63. replicant68

    See no reason for it. Saw it as a movie, not a series. Sorry. Drop this idea and maybe think outside the "box" for once.

    March 3, 2011 at 10:11 pm | Report abuse |
  64. Steve

    Other folks here already said it (separately): this is pure greed and a show of total lack of creative thinking.Think about this: even the 3D effects could not build a cult following for the Tron sequel as much as the original did. I dare say that even the Star Wars prequels now live in obscurity despite a noble effort by the producers and directors. They simply couldn't touch the originality, darkness and suspense of the original, especially The Empire Strikes Back episode.
    There are so many components to the original Blade Runner that just won't ring tru if re-done: the atmosphere create by Ridley Scott, the brilliant music by Vangelis, the superb approach to a very difficult subject by the actors Rutger Hauer, Harrison Ford, Sean Yong, even Daryl Hannah.
    This is s sacred piece of movie history that should never be touched!

    March 3, 2011 at 9:45 pm | Report abuse |
  65. Hillbilly

    Yeah Blade Runner meets the Jetsons.! Please just move onto something else and leave well enough alone.

    March 3, 2011 at 9:43 pm | Report abuse |
  66. Shawn

    Please don't.

    March 3, 2011 at 9:42 pm | Report abuse |
  67. Krissy

    NO!!! Leave it alone! I am sick of Hollywood re-making classic movies! They ruin them!!!!

    March 3, 2011 at 9:41 pm | Report abuse |
  68. Mike

    Yes, if they are only going to do sequels and prequels (instead of this horrendous spate of "remakes"), and they keep true to the original spirit and quality of the original.
    Seriously, Harrison Ford is not going to do this. But, there are many good actors out there who could reprise the roles.

    March 3, 2011 at 9:39 pm | Report abuse |
  69. jay

    loved that movie, leave it alone, guess nobody in boringwood can come up with a new cowboys and aliens......thats new!!!!!!!!!!

    March 3, 2011 at 9:34 pm | Report abuse |
  70. Chuck

    I'm tired of prequels. Seems when they get a good movie, they're afraid to advance the concepts to make one showing what happened "after". It's universe only "advances" in the past. Maybe it's too expensive or they don't know how to represent it properly? A slicker "future" movie would definitely cost more to do. Scifi needs to evolve, just as man is.

    March 3, 2011 at 9:29 pm | Report abuse |
  71. Apelwood

    Thankfully, the rights to remake the original are not up for sale, so people need to calm down as the original is untouchable (for now). What's unfortunate is the overall track record of the production company negotiating the prequel and sequel rights. Alcon is the fine production company that brought us such classics as "Dude, Where's My Car" and "Chasing Liberty".

    March 3, 2011 at 9:11 pm | Report abuse |
  72. Deckard

    I guess nothing is sacred

    March 3, 2011 at 9:05 pm | Report abuse |
  73. mark kali

    Sean Young is still alive?

    March 3, 2011 at 9:05 pm | Report abuse |
  74. maeb

    Let Blade Runner stand on its own!

    the only reason for this slew of prequels, sequels and remakes is a lack of creative imagination - but what else can one expect from this attention deficient, blip-vert culture.

    March 3, 2011 at 8:59 pm | Report abuse |
  75. ken v

    "I have seen things you would not believe....seabees flickering in the dark....attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion...."

    As much as I would like to see what Roy meant when he said that ....I think it's best if you just leave it's perfection just leave it alone.

    March 3, 2011 at 8:49 pm | Report abuse |
  76. Porchiaknows

    NO way. No one can play the role of Roy like Rutger Hauer!

    March 3, 2011 at 8:40 pm | Report abuse |
  77. Rachel

    Leave the orignal to stand alone and try being creative by doing something new and exciting.

    March 3, 2011 at 8:29 pm | Report abuse |
  78. Jody Kulchinsky

    Bring Sean Young! She rocks!!! Harrison Ford can be a great to be in this film under different role.

    March 3, 2011 at 8:21 pm | Report abuse |
  79. Donna

    I think a prequel would be good only if Ridley Scott produced and directed it; only if he stayed with that same dark and eerie sounding format; only if he leaves super-heroes completely out of it; and only if he expands on the Replicant's former experiences in the universe. Like the Replicant said just prior to shutting down for good, "the things I've seen...".
    I'd like to see some of the things he's seen.

    March 3, 2011 at 8:19 pm | Report abuse |
  80. NoraM

    Studios don't care about messing up classics. They care about making money. The End.

    BTW, Blade Runner (my favorite movie) has shown its staying power. A forgettable prequel or sequel will not tarnish the original. Blade Runner was built to last.

    March 3, 2011 at 8:15 pm | Report abuse |
  81. NobodySpecial

    Just another example in a long list of examples to show that Hollywood is being lazy and unoriginal. They can't think of their own ideas nowadays.

    March 3, 2011 at 8:10 pm | Report abuse |
    • Jay

      And as long as we keep rewarding Hollywood by going to see their remakes, they'll keep right on doing it. The movie-going public should start voting more wisely with its pocketbook.

      March 4, 2011 at 8:47 am | Report abuse |
  82. No just No is RIGHT

    Yea like G.I Joe,A-TEAM, Transformers.....just mindless action remakes of the 80's era.

    What next, new MAD MAX?

    March 3, 2011 at 8:06 pm | Report abuse |
    • Mongoose

      Too late. Mad Max 4: Fury Road is in Pre-Production in New South Wales..without Mel Gibson of course. Bummer.

      March 4, 2011 at 6:34 am | Report abuse |
  83. RonM

    Here's an idea...come up with something original and interesting. Leave the classics alone.

    March 3, 2011 at 7:57 pm | Report abuse |
  84. Donovan

    Come up with a single ORIGINAL idea and I'll go see your movie. A SINGLE ORIGINAL IDEA. ONE.

    This remake after remake after remake garbage has gone on long enough.

    March 3, 2011 at 7:53 pm | Report abuse |
  85. Dirk the Daring

    When I get to the movies, you know I'd like to see something more romantic, you know. Like 'An Officer and a Gentleman' or something. Something you can take the wife to you know what I mean?

    March 3, 2011 at 7:47 pm | Report abuse |
  86. TheAlaskaCurmudgeon

    For the love of God, leave this one be.

    March 3, 2011 at 7:40 pm | Report abuse |
  87. Jo

    What a stupid question! Remakes are all they know to do now! They've completely forgotten the craft of original movie making.

    March 3, 2011 at 7:38 pm | Report abuse |
  88. No...Just...NO

    The enduring mystique of the film, whether on purpose or not, is that there is a lot left up to the imagination of the viewer. Quite frankly, American cinema today lacks any form of subtlety: it's all crass, emotionless action. I really don't want to see Blade Runner recast in the footsteps of the presented crop of empty-headed action tripe.

    Just let the movie stand on it's own.

    March 3, 2011 at 7:32 pm | Report abuse |
  89. Lostinthepast

    Only if they release it in both Beta and VHS formats.

    March 3, 2011 at 7:20 pm | Report abuse |
  90. Rastafish

    Do producers dream of excessive profits...

    Sorry Phaedrus but PKD is no longer in this realm.

    March 3, 2011 at 7:15 pm | Report abuse |
  91. Jay2100

    Just goes to show that originality in Hollywood is dead.

    March 3, 2011 at 7:12 pm | Report abuse |
    • Artifex

      As long as they see a cash cow they'll just whip out the stool and bucket to milk it to death.

      March 4, 2011 at 10:38 am | Report abuse |
  92. Tom

    No, no, no... That movie is nearly perfect... Please, just leave it be. It is a work of art.

    March 3, 2011 at 7:10 pm | Report abuse |
  93. Phaedrus

    Only if Ridley Scot is at the helm again, with Phillip K. Dick consulting on it. It's the only path to getting anything remotely of a similar quality as the original.

    If they're going to do it, then DO it the right way!

    March 3, 2011 at 7:06 pm | Report abuse |
    • EviliveSS

      Umm......sorry dude. Dick is dead. 😦

      March 3, 2011 at 7:35 pm | Report abuse |
    • d

      whoever said consult pkd...he has been dead...!!!! also i agree no anything! man in the high tower all the way!!

      March 4, 2011 at 9:03 am | Report abuse |
  94. FactCheck

    Okay, but only if Justin Beiber is cast as Deckard and Lady Gaga as a replicant.

    March 3, 2011 at 7:05 pm | Report abuse |
  95. mojofoto

    Why does it have to be a sequel or prequel? I would be up for a different story in the Blade Runner universe. Keep the tone but introduce different characters and stories.

    March 3, 2011 at 7:04 pm | Report abuse |
  96. Julie

    Err... I'm not so sure about this... it would really have to be done well and not just to sell to the largest audience, which unfortunately is probably the only reason for creating prequels and sequels. in short this sounds more like a studio/producer's idea than an artist with some vision. So please don't bother.

    March 3, 2011 at 7:03 pm | Report abuse |
  97. DisgruntledGrrl

    Err.. tread lightly. I'd rather a prequel – maybe something to touch on the completely untouched parts of the book like the 2 religions that were competing, the artificial animal collection crews. Or maybe some focus on the Replicants.
    Want to make us happy? Want to make an edgy futuristic movie that makes us think?
    TRANSMETROPOLITAN. Make it a series like Wild Palms. Be sure to give it to Ridley Scott.

    March 3, 2011 at 6:59 pm | Report abuse |
  98. arnold ziffle

    Only if it's done right.

    March 3, 2011 at 5:08 pm | Report abuse |
  99. Movie Buff

    I think sometimes people sound like old farts... Think of the opportunity a new direction has for this story, the technology out now... Bladerunner is a Cult hit and will stay that way forever... updating a movie like this wouldn't be that bad if done right... Prequel or sequel wouldn't do anything to the original, I don't think the Star Wars prequels changed my views on the original ones... Why not see where they can take it, if it sucks we won't watch, if it's good, awesome!

    March 3, 2011 at 3:51 pm | Report abuse |
    • Luke Warm

      Star Wars is a much more linear story. You could do a hundred prequels. Luke's great great great grandpappy's battle with the mutant zombie androids. If they make one they'll surely foul it up, but I'd like to see it center on Roy Batty. He's done...questionable things.

      March 3, 2011 at 10:29 pm | Report abuse |
    • JeramieH

      I want to see C-beams glitter in the dark near Tannhauser Gate.

      March 4, 2011 at 11:41 am | Report abuse |
    • David

      "TIME TO DIE"

      April 20, 2011 at 2:27 pm | Report abuse |
  100. Paul

    Good Lord... It's come to this? Please, please, do not.

    March 3, 2011 at 3:41 pm | Report abuse |
  101. goreshade

    Unnecessary. Please don't.

    March 3, 2011 at 3:35 pm | Report abuse |
  102. Benjamin

    As much as I love Blade Runner, I can't really think of anything a sequel or prequel would add to the "franchise" (one off movies are franchises now?) and I can think of a thousand ways a sequel or prequel would wreck the original film. There are some stories that just don't need every possible plot thread and back story explored. Sometimes it's OK to leave a little ambiguity and unexplained elements and sometimes it even makes the films better. There was a time when fans wondered what happened off screen during, before, and after movies and that feeling was part of the experience. Now you just buy/watch/play the book/comic/prequel/sequel/spin-off/TV series/video game. There's no interpretation left in film. No one debates movies anymore because there's nothing left to discuss. Everything's spelled out for you in one medium or another.

    March 3, 2011 at 3:21 pm | Report abuse |
    • Jagman

      Absolutely agree. There was an excellent Brit Crime-SciFi called 'Life on mars' I watched it avidly, and was excited when an American remake came out. The director? producer? felt the need to explain absolutely each and every nuance that had been hinted at in the original. The acting wasn't horrible, but the thing was completely killed by utter story-telling incompetence. If you assume your audience are complete idiots, only idiots will watch your drivel.

      March 4, 2011 at 8:25 am | Report abuse |
  103. Martin

    Why does everything either have to be a re-make or a sequel now a days? Don't get me wrong, there have been some good sequels but those are few and far between. However, I will be interested to see where this goes as I have enjoyed all inarnations of the film.

    March 3, 2011 at 2:54 pm | Report abuse |
  104. ryanzzzz

    Then they'll be making "Bladerunner versus Predator" movies.

    March 3, 2011 at 2:54 pm | Report abuse |
  105. RBH

    No. Dear dog, no. Let "Blade Runner" stand as the classic it is. Meanwhile, there are two films coming soon based on the works of Philip K. Dick: "The Adjustment Bureau" and the long-delayed "Radio Free Albemuth". What I'
    d love to see, though, is a faithful adaptation of "The Man In The High Tower."

    March 3, 2011 at 2:46 pm | Report abuse |
    • Aaron

      Yes! The Man In The High Tower would be brilliant to see (done right) on the big screen. Honestly don't know how anyone could possibly improve or even just match the original Bladerunner. The pre-CGI effects in that movie surpass pretty much everything current in realism and atmosphere. Foolish idea.

      March 4, 2011 at 7:35 am | Report abuse |
  106. Victor

    This is terrible. I'm sure they'll make a mess of it.

    March 3, 2011 at 2:43 pm | Report abuse |
    • victorisanass


      March 3, 2011 at 11:38 pm | Report abuse |
    • deckard

      Doesn't anyone here actually READ Philip K. Dick? It's "The Man in the High CASTLE", for cryin' out loud, not "The Man in the High Tower". Sheeeesh! (walks away shaing his head)

      March 4, 2011 at 9:40 am | Report abuse |
    • boom

      Just dont touch the original movie which was insanely good. in the sequels and prequels dont try to OUTDUE the original movie as u will most likely fail badly as ive seen nothing like the original since the original so no one exists today to equal its greatness

      March 4, 2011 at 9:45 am | Report abuse |

Post a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

About this blog

Our daily cheat-sheet for breaking celebrity news, Hollywood buzz and your pop-culture obsessions.