Daniel Craig spends the holidays with Rachel Weisz
December 27th, 2010
11:58 AM ET

Daniel Craig spends the holidays with Rachel Weisz

Looks like Daniel Craig is doing some serious bonding with Rachel Weisz. The duo were spotted holding hands while strolling through the English countryside this weekend.

The actors, who play husband and wife in the upcoming thriller "Dream House," reportedly shared a cottage in snowy Dorset and were later seen walking hand-in-hand together and entering a pub.

"They were laughing and chatting and hanging on to each other's words and stopping to take photos of each other," an onlooker told Britain's News of the World, which published photos of the pair.

Weisz, 40, announced her split from partner of nine years Darren Aronofsky in November. At the time, she and 42-year-old Craig – who reportedly parted ways with girlfriend Satsuki Mitchell – denied that they were an item.

According to the Daily Mail, however, Weisz admitted that she and Craig had great chemistry while filming "Dream House."

"We’ve been getting on really well and yet I still haven’t had an offer to be a Bond girl - but if he asks me I’d definitely do it!" she reportedly said.

soundoff (47 Responses)
  1. chris

    DANIEL CRAIG is gay. Seriously. You people do not read enough.

    He is not a straight man, so this is all a ruse.

    I do not have a problem with him being gay. I just hate to sit here and read people getting sucked into another ruse.

    He is gay.

    December 28, 2010 at 8:26 am | Report abuse |
  2. Rick

    Daniel Craig has been an awesome Bond so far. Anytime you have James Bond windsurfing down the face of a glacier and driving an invisible car (i.e. Pierce Brosnan in Die Another Day) there's a problem. Craig has made Bond more human, darker and grittier. I'm eagerly waiting the next movie.

    December 28, 2010 at 7:19 am | Report abuse |
  3. In the West

    Daniel is a teenage troll, or at least I hope he is, because if he's an adult I'm afraid he's already too far down the road to loserdom to ever make it back. And Daniel, if your so "successful" at so many things, why are you posting (over and over) on a CNN comment board? My guess is that you're a lonely, resentful little pr!ck who doesn't have anyone to spend the evening with. Good luck with that.

    December 28, 2010 at 2:27 am | Report abuse |
    • Daniel

      and yet you read every single post..I am about to say a phrase that you have heard often in your life, probably said to you by people like me.....LOSER!!!

      December 28, 2010 at 4:29 am | Report abuse |
    • Amy

      Haha. Daniel is the loser. What a pathetic waste of air.

      December 28, 2010 at 5:26 am | Report abuse |
    • Daniel

      @Amy – thank-you for your input. Your retort was so well thought out that I can only assume that your eloquence is unrivaled here and that you probably are educated well beyond your years...is that a MBA you have. No? Well you could have fooled me and every one else here. Good job ! Keep up the great work !

      December 28, 2010 at 2:40 pm | Report abuse |
  4. Gimlet

    I think she looked hot in the mummy, but seems to be getting worse with age. Me thinks there's a cameo appearance coming up in the 'Big Book of British Smiles'.

    December 28, 2010 at 12:50 am | Report abuse |
  5. jelar12

    Daniel Craig has a daughter from a previous marriage so he has 'baggage' as you call it too.

    December 27, 2010 at 11:06 pm | Report abuse |
    • Daniel

      baggage and stretch marks, saggyness....errrr wait a minute, well at the very least he can appreciate those things.

      December 28, 2010 at 12:04 am | Report abuse |
  6. Sam Kinnison

    if you are a man with 0 aspirations, then you are probably attracted to inner beauty. Instead of being that guy, Im disgusted with inner ugliness and delighted with outer beauty. covers both bases and its true.

    December 27, 2010 at 10:49 pm | Report abuse |
  7. Jo

    Daniel, your arrogance is truly nauseating. Sure, being truthfull is a wonderfull trait, but coming from you (Oh so delicately) on such a subject is horrifying. I shudder to think of the poor woman who's fate should fall into your hands, for she will never be able to grow old gracefully. You will be after her forever to keep her your little kewpie doll, until like so many others well into their older years, look freakish in their attemp at the fountain of youth. Work on yourself. not others.

    Walter, that was my thought exactly. It's so sad. That's the problem in hollywood. These actors meet on the set, fall in love, marry, then go on to make a new movie, fall in love with the NEW co-star, divorce, marry, repeat...

    December 27, 2010 at 9:59 pm | Report abuse |
    • Daniel

      Jo, you are obviously quite slow minded aren't you. If you had bothered to read my comment it was asking about a single (unattached) male becoming involved with a woman who previously had a child. Having a wife, children and growing old isn't really what was being addressed now was it? Next time, read the comment and address it properly.

      December 27, 2010 at 10:28 pm | Report abuse |
  8. mark gayle


    December 27, 2010 at 9:25 pm | Report abuse |
  9. Leo

    Roger Moore was the best Bond Period.....Followed by Sean Connery...

    December 27, 2010 at 9:13 pm | Report abuse |
  10. Mary

    They are a good looking couple. They are both very good actors (A+ believable). And if they are both committed to a real relationship I wish them well.

    December 27, 2010 at 7:38 pm | Report abuse |
  11. David in Houston

    He was recently spotted in a gay bar, dancing with, and kissing another man. (do a Google search) So, yeah, I'm thinking she's either his beard OR this a publicity stunt to squelch the gay rumors.

    December 27, 2010 at 7:20 pm | Report abuse |
  12. Walter

    Daniel Craig dating Rachel Weisz
    Whoa, this is the first time a one of those childlike people known as an actor has ever dated a co-star from a movie set, isn't it. CNN?
    Stop the presses.

    December 27, 2010 at 7:18 pm | Report abuse |
  13. Richard

    LOL they were both engaged to other people- so much for devotion yeah this is love to last the ages.

    December 27, 2010 at 6:48 pm | Report abuse |
  14. Sara

    Good for them and the best of luck.

    December 27, 2010 at 6:07 pm | Report abuse |
  15. Jerry

    Connery, Moore, Craig, Brosnan, Lazenby, Niven, (or has everyone forgotten the original "Casino Royale"?) Dalton.

    December 27, 2010 at 5:11 pm | Report abuse |
    • Katharine

      For my money it's Craig, Lazenby, Connery, Brosnan, Moore, Dalton. With a big space between Connery and the rest. I'll give you Niven, and I love the original Casino Royale (and particularly Woody Allen as Bond's son), but it's just so nutty it can hardly be called a true Bond movie.

      December 28, 2010 at 2:22 am | Report abuse |
    • Jerry

      Woody's character – Jimmy Bond – wasn't 007's son, he was his nephew.

      December 30, 2010 at 6:04 pm | Report abuse |
  16. Merle

    Daniel ... you're an A$$.

    December 27, 2010 at 3:18 pm | Report abuse |
  17. txkboy

    SO, now the truth comes out about why she missed the last "Mummy" movie, as Evy...lol.

    December 27, 2010 at 2:53 pm | Report abuse |
  18. Superhiro

    Interesting opinions... I stand firm however. Worst Bond ever.

    December 27, 2010 at 2:51 pm | Report abuse |
  19. Daniel

    Not that Rachel Weisz isn't beautiful, I just have a hard time understanding why a single man would want a woman with children and the baggage that it entails....not only the physical, stretch marks, sagging etc, but the baggage of the ex-husband and all that entials. He is freakin James Bond and could have any tart he wants.

    December 27, 2010 at 2:45 pm | Report abuse |
    • dawn

      That's natural, the stretch marks and sagging, etc you commented. Better than all the plastic surgery nowadays.

      December 27, 2010 at 4:58 pm | Report abuse |
    • katie

      You sound like a peach Daniel. Get many women?

      December 27, 2010 at 5:33 pm | Report abuse |
    • EvoDevo

      Nice opener, Daniel. Check in now and then on the comments you'll be getting.

      December 27, 2010 at 6:22 pm | Report abuse |
    • Daniel

      @Kate Denizen – if any man has ever told you that he finds you impressive not because of your looks but for other qualities...you are probably very ugly and he is trying to think of something nice to say to you.

      December 27, 2010 at 8:15 pm | Report abuse |
    • Daniel

      @Katie – I am very successful (in all things not just women) which is why I am not forced to lower my standards. I also maintain there is no such thing as a MILF and I am a fan of breast augmentation, and other elective surgeries that are available to women to make them more attractive.

      Furthermore, It has been my experience that grown women who continue to call themselves 'Katie' or similar young girl names, are often trying desperately to hold on to their youth and are no longer appropriate for their station in life. Time to grow up Katie.

      December 27, 2010 at 8:20 pm | Report abuse |
    • Ryan

      @Whatapig – Why would you call someone a pig for having an position and living his life within that position? I agree with Daniel, you sound extremely bitter. You are an ostridge, burying your head in the sand if you think his comments are not valid for a great many of the male population. Simply put, some men do not care about post pregnancy effects on a woman but they are probably in a committed relationship, but that is not what he is refering to, now is it?

      December 27, 2010 at 9:04 pm | Report abuse |
    • elinor

      Maybe he wants a real woman? Or maybe he knows something that you obviously don't, which is that older, more mature women are wiser and often much better in bed, even if they do have a few more wrinkles or stretch marks or their boobs don't stick straight out and barely move when they jump. And she looks ten times better than a lot of 25 year old women I know. Gorgeous. By the way, I know plenty of 40 year olds who've have kids and have no stretch marks or sagging. Just sayin'.

      December 27, 2010 at 9:18 pm | Report abuse |
    • Anevay

      Let me guess, you are a perfect man who only dates perfect women. You don't have a hairy back, pimples, or bulge in your belly. You don't have b.o. and you don't fart. You only date women who have 1% body fat and whose boobs stay perky well into their 70's.

      December 28, 2010 at 2:47 am | Report abuse |
    • Daniel

      @Anevay – I am not perfect – almost but not quite. I don't have a hairy back, pimples or gut and the bulge I have is lower down. I date very attractive women, but perfer women with curves so 1% body fat is not applicable. Although I have high standards, I will not enter into a relationship with a mother – not matter how good looking.

      So, I assume you are asking me these questions because you're interested, so do you fit the qualifications?

      December 28, 2010 at 4:41 am | Report abuse |
    • Amy

      You must be trolling for attention, because no one could be as stupid as you, Daniel. If you're serious, I feel really sorry for you. Because I guarantee you will be miserable when you're older. Once your metabolism catches up with you and your hair starts falling out, your sad little "standards" are going to have a hard time with the loneliness.

      December 28, 2010 at 5:23 am | Report abuse |
    • BillieJo

      I'am a woman and I agree with you, Daniel. There are many surgeries out there for men to have done that I would strongly recommend; hair transplant, tummy tucks. no grey on what hair they do have and OMG wax everything other than the head!!! There are even male enhancement surgeries out there, I am in support of the men who do this like the women who have breast implants. Of course, it is the mens choice (like the breast implants) but I will not touch them unless they have a good job, look decent, and if they cannot preform then get surgery or use pharmacutical enhancements. I would not waste my time with all the (baggage) Rachel or Bond has either. Both way too nasty, old, and past their prime – Daniel heres to many conquests and a future of beauty for both of us in 2011

      December 28, 2010 at 7:27 am | Report abuse |
  20. me

    I guess she couldn't forgive Darren for The Fountain.

    December 27, 2010 at 2:13 pm | Report abuse |
  21. cheefsfury


    December 27, 2010 at 2:07 pm | Report abuse |
  22. Jem

    @Superhiro: You are mistaken he is the seccond best James Bond, the heigherarchy of Bond's is as follows from greatest to worst: Sean Connery, Daniel Craig, Goerge Lazenby, Peirce Brosnan, Roger Moore, Timothy dalton.

    December 27, 2010 at 12:59 pm | Report abuse |
  23. Lulu

    Beautiful and talented couple!

    December 27, 2010 at 12:06 pm | Report abuse |

Post a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

About this blog

Our daily cheat-sheet for breaking celebrity news, Hollywood buzz and your pop-culture obsessions.