Rachel Weisz and Darren Aronofsky split
November 9th, 2010
11:07 AM ET

Rachel Weisz and Darren Aronofsky split

Hollywood power pair Rachel Weisz and Darren Aronofsky are calling it quits after nine years together.

The couple, who are parents to 4-year-old Henry Chance, released the following joint statement to CNN through a rep: "Rachel Weisz and Darren Aronofsky have been separated for some months. They remain close friends and are committed to raising their son together in NYC."

Weisz, 40, and Aronofsky, 41,  had been engaged since 2005 but never married.

Weisz told Redbook in 2009, "Darren and I are completely committed to 'until death do us part,' although we haven't made it official with the paperwork yet...It's not for any political reason or that we're waiting for this or for that, but maybe one day we will have an official ceremony."

Still, Weisz admitted at the time that maintaining a relationship had its challenges. "I don't think balance is something you get from someone else; it's something women have to find from within," she told the magazine. "For me, finding balance is still a work in progress. Darren provides the foundation, but I'm still figuring out my own juggling act."

soundoff (24 Responses)
  1. El Jefe

    Man, he must have a 14" Johnson AND a 10" tongue, or something..

    November 11, 2010 at 1:22 pm | Report abuse |
  2. YEt Again

    Who are these people? NO one cares if they are together or not.

    November 10, 2010 at 9:09 am | Report abuse |
  3. @Truth

    You shut your dirtywh0re mouth

    November 9, 2010 at 4:01 pm | Report abuse |
  4. kittybling

    Puny with a sleazy moustache vs.James bond hunk..you pick.. no surprise there...

    November 9, 2010 at 3:50 pm | Report abuse |
  5. TerryH

    Sweet, what is her phone number?

    November 9, 2010 at 3:41 pm | Report abuse |
  6. Truth

    Rachel is a nobody. Now if you want hot, google Grace Park.

    November 9, 2010 at 3:07 pm | Report abuse |
  7. SoulTrain1943

    He is made o dem marshmellows

    November 9, 2010 at 2:45 pm | Report abuse |
  8. Embarrassment of Riches

    This guy was married to Rachel Weisz, and he got Natalie Portman and Mila Kunis to make out for his latest film. Seriously? This live-action Ned Flanders?

    November 9, 2010 at 2:33 pm | Report abuse |
  9. CNN is awesome

    "Rachel Weisz and Darren Aronofsky have been separated for some months"
    Out-frakin-standing reporting CNN. Months old news about this "power couple"

    Once again, outdoing all expectations. Mark Marino, way to be on the pulse of modern news...

    November 9, 2010 at 1:58 pm | Report abuse |
    • Douglas

      Are you stupid or are you stupid?
      They broke up months ago but they just released the statement so it's news today, so it's not "months old news".
      Learn to read.

      November 9, 2010 at 3:08 pm | Report abuse |
    • @Douglas

      Mark Marino is that you?

      November 9, 2010 at 3:12 pm | Report abuse |
  10. JB!

    I can't figure out if she's hot or not. Maybe she can be but doesn't do the right look for her. Or maybe I'm a guy with bar close standards. Bud dammit I know Paris Hilton is NOT hot and Roselyn Sanchez is so...

    November 9, 2010 at 1:39 pm | Report abuse |
    • Valerie

      ...and YOUR opinion on her looks matter how, again????

      Seriously, why don't you post a picture of YOURSELF, we can all use a good laugh right about now!

      November 9, 2010 at 2:10 pm | Report abuse |
    • Steven Seagal

      JB! ignore Valerie. She's obviously another one of the Sea Hag lookalikes who post on these blogs. Lots of fat broads around here who hate it that men don't buy the "big is beautiful" line they're trying to feed us.

      November 9, 2010 at 2:13 pm | Report abuse |
    • Valerie

      Thanks Steven, that would be utterly hilarious if I were overweight, but I am not. And at 5'10" 140 lbs of beautiful muscle, I'd kick your teeth out right in front of your fat wife if given the chance.......

      God bless! ...........

      November 9, 2010 at 2:19 pm | Report abuse |
    • @Valerie

      1- Steven Seagall is a bad@$$, so you better watchyomouf
      2- How you doin;?
      3- Your statement is worthless without pics

      November 9, 2010 at 2:47 pm | Report abuse |
    • Observer

      Valerie is proff positive of why

      November 9, 2010 at 3:09 pm | Report abuse |
    • Nyarlathotep

      After visiting Observer's site for what I thought would be a laugh, I discovered he's one of those religious maniacs who hates non-conformist women, gays, atheists and ... the number one sign of paranoia .... the JOOOOOS! Valerie, I gladly team up with you to go kick his teeth in.

      November 9, 2010 at 4:03 pm | Report abuse |
  11. Falstaff1962

    I'll take her over any of the 22 year old bimbettes who can't act any day.

    November 9, 2010 at 1:24 pm | Report abuse |
  12. the_dude

    She finally realized he can't do anything to help her career

    November 9, 2010 at 1:20 pm | Report abuse |
  13. boyscout

    I'm available Rachel!

    November 9, 2010 at 1:15 pm | Report abuse |
  14. Chris

    Did she just wake up one morning and think, "Holy cripes! I'm gorgeous Rachel Weisz... what am I doing with this David Arquette wannabe?"

    November 9, 2010 at 11:33 am | Report abuse |
    • Not

      He's not even in David's league far uglier.

      November 9, 2010 at 2:37 pm | Report abuse |
    • Tonic

      Except that he's genius. Some people actually care about that sort of thing. There is no amount of plastic surgery that can make it happen.

      November 9, 2010 at 4:15 pm | Report abuse |

Post a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

About this blog

Our daily cheat-sheet for breaking celebrity news, Hollywood buzz and your pop-culture obsessions.