June 1st, 2011
10:50 AM ET
Blake Lively: Those nude pics are fakePhotos claiming to be of a naked Blake Lively spread across the Web Tuesday, but a rep for the actress says they’re not really her. According to Us Weekly, the images show a blonde woman taking photos of herself in the buff, but the 23-year-old “Gossip Girl” star’s rep says Lively hasn’t done such a thing. "The photos of Blake Lively which have just surfaced on various websites including Perez Hilton and Zap2it are 100 percent fake," her rep tells Us. “Blake has never taken nude photos of herself.” To top it off, she’s also pursuing “legal action against the publication which initially published these photographs and any other outlets that republish them in any manner,” her rep says. You can next see (a clothed) Blake Lively when “Green Lantern” arrives in theaters June 17. |
About this blog
Our daily cheat-sheet for breaking celebrity news, Hollywood buzz and your pop-culture obsessions. |
If they're not her, then there would be no reason for legal action. It's obviously her.j
So fake, she is threatening lawsuits. LOL. If they were fake, she wouldn't care.
totally not her. The girl in that pic looks like a crack hoe!!
I wouldn't mind getting nekkid with her.
I don't get it. She is average looking and not especially better actress than any other tramp in hollywood. She must have some other special talent that gets all the directors and producers off. I wonder what that is.......
What's the big deal. She sees herself naked every day. She's attractive and I'd do her in a heartbeat but I'm not going to lose any sleep over it.
Leighton Meester is much hotter!
She is not the type of young woman to lower herself to that level just because she is attractive and happens to be in the acting business. Those of you who made nasty comments need to take your dirty words elsewhere better yet keep it to yourselves. Blake is a classy young lady & she has every right to pursue legal action against the person or persons reponsible for spreading this garbage around the web.
Good rubbin off material either way
I know they are real. Sarah Palin said so and she never lies, then Lance Armstrong called and backed it up. But what;s the big deal if they are? She's a talentless ho anyway. At least she's got a decent body to look at. Snooki sent me shots of her and I thought it was a pig roast.
Its her! Even Jamie Foxx did it last year just to see what he looked like!
Easily fake, look at the one where you see her face. Top of her head, hair and face are blurred but the bottom of her hair is not. Plus the cabinets in the back would be blurred too so yep these are fake as heck! Nice try though.
Thanks for deleting my posts CNN.
Shot pics of her... FROM DOWNTOWN!!!
You people are losers who cares even if it is her ....or if its not....really whoo cares either why it won't affect any of u.
You sure say "who cares" a lot for someone who obviously cares a LOT more than anyone else here.
Female stars do this all the time. Especially when their fame star seems to be fading out. Just another way for stars to keep their name in the limelight. Then they deny it and drag the drama on even longer. Dumb fame mongers!
Fake 'ey? *fap fap fap*
That's her damn body show it IF that's what she want. Whomever it is.
Hey you. Stop caring.
I haven't taken the time to check the picture but fake or not think about it, she has her new movie with Ryan airing in a few weeks. Coincidence? The timing seems a little to perfect if you ask me.
You gotta a point, nice work.
That is if you can't play with the big dogs go get on the porch!
All the little starlets pose nude at 1 point or another! Why deny?!? Nudity is such friggin prudity in this country! We're in the 21st century, not the 17th! Also, & this is a Big lesson for all playing around with their phone cameras, if you don't want it for public consumption, Don't take the pic! That goes for politicians, too. Very simple,logical& doable!
Yeah seriously, where da pictures at CNN? Give us a link!
Did you hear that Sylvanas posed nude for Blizzard Boobs Magazine? OOOOOO LALA!
Then I guess that the comprmising photographs of her with ABDULLAH THE BUTCHER are fake too............NOT
Meh, fake or not its a pretty underwhelming self-shot. Take some photo classes honey.
Is she claiming that's not her naked body and that someone superimposed her face on to that body? That's what "fake" means right? Good luck with that claim she's going to need it! Only delusional fans (see above) would say otherwise.
Blakes face is longer and her chin is an oval type that pops out a bit, fake blake is way to round faced and those not have blakes chin. Fake Fake Love you Blake.
Lastly anyone who has a brain can search for blake pics on google or whatever and find tons of her pics in revealing outfits where you see her breast and no mole to be seen in the area where fake blake has hers
Just saw the pics they are so fake the fake blake has the beauty mark on the wrong side of her face and her chin is so diffrent, also her cheeks are way to curved to be blake.
she was taking the pix in the mirror
Explain the Mole on fake blakes upper area in chest and non existence on real blake?
Sure looks like her to me!! Same body type and everything!
She should take pity on us all and jump from the nearest highest building.
Show us how it's done Its a Driveby. We'd like a demonstration from you first.
if somebody did that to me? i would sue the hell outta them too!!!!!
Don't worry, no one wants to post your nude pics doe the world to see. I promise.
them republicans all be ruining this place
I don't know what the consternation is about. Honestly, how many good-looking woman in showbiz DO we know who haven't posed nude at some point??
@John: there are other things to sue for besides copyright violation. Some options might be defamation, invation of privacy, false light, etc.
Who gives a crap? This chick is another one that will die of the super aids
Yeah you've seen one nekkid hot chick you pretty much wanna see them all!!!! That's why we care...
That's not her. Seriously people come on!! It's not her!!
dude, are you being serious? look at the mole on her chest. look at her fingers. it's her.
And the mole on her right cheek (face cheek.)
Uh, if the pics aren't of her, then she doesn't have any copyright ownership and thus no grounds to sue if reported, no?
I do believe there's that whole defamation of character thing.
Defamation is completely inaplicable and she cannot sue for that. There is a reasonable possibility that they are of her – and to prove defamation she would have to 1: prove they are not of her and 2: that the person posting the pictures had actual knowledge they were not of her. It would likey be impossible for her to prove either. Rather, her only grounds for suit is 1: copyright if the photos are her (she would lose for any news type websites) and 2: possibly a right to publicity (you can win lawsuits where the photo is designed to resemble a person if the photo is used for commercial purposes (not celeb news purposes) – e.g., Vanna White won a lawsuit against a Samsung add that had a robot resembling Vanna White).
IF YOU CAN'T PLAY WITH THE BIG DOGS GET OFF THE PORCH
"You can lead a gift horse to water...but don't look at his teeth!" –ARCHIE BUNKER
If the photos aren't of Lively, why does she feel a need to "take legal action," hmm?
After looking at them, I'd say her primary concerns are the photography sux, the poses are trite, and that "hot bod" isn't as hot as she needs everyone to think it is.
SO TRUE!!!!
If someone released fake pictures of ME sans apparel, I'd sue too.
*I* want to make money off of them, not some moron who faked them!
Regrettably, the EPA has forbidden publication of my body without a massive amount of clothing, due to ossification of those who have viewed it in the past.
Remember Lot's wife? She saw me in a speedo...
They are her. I did extensive research all night long, and the Octagon, James Westfall and Dr. Kenneth Noisewater concur with my findings.
You call it "research"?
Research, fapping, same difference.
http://www.wwtdd.com/
here they are.
You can view many more pictures on thedirty.com
her rep is seriously claiming these aren't her??? yeah right. these are her right down to her silver iphone in a black case. 'she's never taken nude photos of herself'??? LOL. okay, rep.
Come on cnn, where's the link to the pics?
lmao. WORD!
You can see it @ heidiandfrank.com, under newton's cradle. It's her.
I have some pics of her and Oprah scissoring.
I just threw up a little in my mouth and yet I still got a chubby. I hate you...
Link please!
What, they don't have Google on your internet? Took me five seconds to find and yes, they're completely real. That girl be lyin'...