What? Don't act like this moment wasn't coming.
From the minute word spread that the two were reportedly getting cozy - at least twice over coffee - the names have been tumbling out. Now that photos of the wide-awake pair are being spotted - Us Weekly's dropped a few into this week's issue - we think it's time to officially give them a name.
Plus, nothing says "we're a couple! Reportedly!" like a nickname. Let us know what you think we should be calling this duo, and if you have more suggestions, leave 'em in the comments.
Goede verzending en dit bericht heeft me veel geholpen in mijn studententijd opdracht. Dankbaarheid u als uw informatie.
I was really laughing reading all your comments:) At least I learned how to make a survey:) I am on it..!:)
However, I agree with the answer: "You can't be serious":)
Please read our predictions on Jennifer Aniston...always entertaining:)
How about "Untalented"...?
She's a f@g hag-every man she's with is g@y- that's why they go out for coffee-and will go furniture shopping together later
Actually the correct answer is "Nobodies" we should call them "Nobodies"
im sick of celebrity recycling. he was just with reece for a year or two... this girl is too young for him and these celebs just pass their bodies like a plate of food at a dinner table. its disgusting.
We can call them "three months tops" before Jake gets bored and moves onto Miley Cyrus.
I know what we can call you. A dumba$$
How about trash
How about "talentless parasites of society"? Or wait... wait.. how about "C-list entertainers?" No? How about "Completely irrelevant to everything"? One of those'll stick.
i like that ; its cute & classy ! (:
I know she's like 20 but... how about Child and Predator? I kid I kid.
How about by their names? There's a novel approach to civility!
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Our daily cheat-sheet for breaking celebrity news, Hollywood buzz and your pop-culture obsessions.
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.
Join 7,767 other followers