Supermarket tabloid The National Enquirer is ineligible to compete for the nation’s top journalism award, the administrator of the Pulitzer Prize board said today, dashing the publication’s hopes to enter the competition for its reporting on the John Edwards’ love child scandal.
When the former presidential candidate confirmed on Thursday that he had fathered a child with his former campaign videographer Rielle Hunter, the Enquirer said that it would submit its reporting for the prize.
News of the magazine’s plan sparked fierce debate among journalists over whether an outlet that is allowed to pay sources for information should be eligible to compete for the vaunted award. However, despite the insider bristling and posturing, the mag’s ineligibility is based on a technicality.
"We checked the Enquirer Web site, and it apparently calls itself a magazine. Under our rules, magazines (both print and Web versions) and broadcast entities are ineligible," said the prize administrator Sig Gissler in an e-mail to ABCNews.com.
The National Enquirer broke the Edwards story in July 2008. Eighteen months later, Edwards confessed that he fathered a child outside of his marriage.
Pulitzer...nobel...whatever...both phony baloney....
Oh, that's where you're wrong, Robert. There's only one group (comprised of about 20 people) in the world that is authorized to give awards. The same people handing the Nobels out also give out the Cable Ace Awards. They were even responsible for that Spelling Bee you won in grade school!
Hey Debra.... that was the Nobel Peace Prize not the Pulitzer. Please get it straight.
Hey you gave an award to Obama for doing nothing...the National Enquireer is right down your alley...at least they were factually correct
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Our daily cheat-sheet for breaking celebrity news, Hollywood buzz and your pop-culture obsessions.
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.
Join 7,772 other followers