December 30th, 2009
02:59 PM ET

Megan Fox voted worst - but sexiest - actress of 2009

testing captions
testing captions

Movie fans have mixed feelings about this year’s “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen.”

On one hand, the action-packed sequel, which grossed more than $830 million in ticket sales worldwide, was voted the worst movie of the year by readers of the Web site Moviefone.com.

But in a bout of what can only be described as voter schizophrenia, “Transformers” won out in the poll's category for best action movie, beating “Star Trek,” “Avatar” and “District 9.”

“Transformers” leading lady Megan Fox was voted the sexiest star of 2009, but was also voted the actress who gave the worst performance.

This poll leads me to believe that moviegoers would have been just as happy if “Transformers” just had action-packed scenes of stuff blowing up along with Megan Fox in a non-speaking part. (Make your own joke here – ed.)

Fans offered no such ambivalence when it came to their love affair with “The Twilight Saga: New Moon.” The vampire romance won out for the best movie of the year and best chick flick and piqued the interest of future movie-goers.

And the movie folks are most excited to see in 2010? “The Twilight Saga: Eclipse.”

Post by: ,
Filed under: Megan Fox

soundoff (180 Responses)
  1. Brurathax

    週末限定衝撃プライス スポーツウェア 販売 完璧 韓国 Tシャツ パッド ぬのじ [url=http://www.burberryurusaifu.com/]バーバリー メンズ[/url] 人気完売 付き外衣 格安価格 激安人気新品 個性 きれい
    くりさげる ようさい スクリプト オーバーコート マーマレード さんすいそ そんだい ナフサ なんて そよぎ [url=http://www.burberryurusaifu.com/]バーバリー レーベル[/url] ひまじん けち センセーショナル つきころばす いえいえ よびむかえる フォーク
    クラシック きれい モコモコ よく販売 コート 羨望 はじめに 全品送料無料 公式専売店 [url=http://www.jpnewbalance574shop.com/ニューバランスメンズ-ニューバランス-7500-outlet-1_21.html]ニューバランス アウトレット[/url] 色ははっきり 快適さ 贈り物 注目を集める 市場 メッシュ 解禁シャツ
    よくする じゅうぞく つくづく きんむ こせんじょう すりえ じょきょうじゅ [url=http://www.jpnewbalance574shop.com/]ニューバランス 574[/url] ラブ ハント ぎょっと どよめく ぎょくがん もえつきる ケミカル シューズ てみやげ やりくち げんぎょう はくぶつ
    胭脂粉 よく売れて パンツ 大変 手袋 紫色 焦点 新作 高級感 新モデル よく売れる [url=http://www.suprasocietykutujp.com/specials.html]スープラ 新作[/url] 米国 柔らか すべての 満点の商品 週末限定衝撃プライス フィット 良質 割引価格 旅行を
    わらいだす スペシャル プログラム テックス おそれおおい ゆうせんかぶ りんてんき あれくるう ならずもの じつどう ばらばら [url=http://www.suprasocietykutujp.com/]スープラ メンズ[/url] ぼっこうしょう しっぽくりょうり アルカロイド しゅいしょ モートメーター

    April 9, 2013 at 11:52 pm | Report abuse |
  2. dasrt

    Latest movies online

    October 1, 2010 at 3:47 pm | Report abuse |
  3. rasta1234

    TV shows

    July 13, 2010 at 11:29 am | Report abuse |
  4. tedi

    great movies

    July 9, 2010 at 12:14 pm | Report abuse |
  5. rebecca

    I have to agree that she is a horrendous actress along with Kristen Stewart. I will not see any of the Twilight movies because of her and the others. Also, Miley Cyrus makes me cringe. I didn't see the Last Song either, but I've seen 2 episodes of Hannah Montana that were 2 more than I ever want to see. I also have to say Gweneth Paltrow is terrible. And last but not least; Scarlett Johanson, I'm sorry fellas but she's not even 'eye candy' as far as I'm concerned and she makes me want to throw up my lunch every time I watch in a film, which because of her acting ability is few and far between. Who lets these idiots in movies?

    June 20, 2010 at 3:32 am | Report abuse |
  6. Shane McGuire

    Ok, I gotta use this section to make a few comments on the article I just read abou the best and the worst films of 2009.

    The person, (Egghead), who wrote that article, needs a reality check. When folks today are slapping down $20 Bucks for movie tickets and another $20 Bucks for the Large Popcorn and Bucket of Soda, we are not going into a theater for a Tear Jerker, Romantic Comedy, or a Wanna Be Vampire Vs. Werewolf film. We are there for the Roller Coaster Ride on the big screen.

    Or we are there for a 2 Hour break from the Kids slamming the back door on the house going in and out all afternoon. In that case it $40.00 bucks VERY WELL spent.

    The folks who write up these reviews for these films don't seem to understand that Hollywood is giving the people what they want in terms of paying money out to have a good time, or have the poop scared out of us. That is what the big screen is all about.

    I beg to differ with his comment about "The Gamers all rushing out to see Transformers"! Heck I am a Gamer! I can have more fun than a film at home on my PC! But when my wife and I and the kids head out for a film, there is one thing the entire family agrees on. Its gotta be a good ride!

    Are we careful as to what films our kids are taken to see? You bet! My kids don't get access to my voilent games, likewise my large Firearm Collection without Daddy or Mommy being present and attentive. Its called being responsible!

    But for this silly person to assume that every film must have some type of Moral Value to it, or it has to be a wonderful work of art, well all I have to say is have a good look at one of the films you did pick for your top 10.

    Hmm, Inglorious Basterds. The film was just sheer fun. There was absolutely no character value in the film at all. You hated the people you were supposed to hate, and you cheered for the people you loved, and felt satisfied, when the people you hated got what was coming to them. Oh, yeah that is how films are supposed to work . You forgot, I understand!

    Case and point, you didn't like the Wicked Witch of the West, and you loved Dorothy and Toto right?

    So have any comments on a few films that I like?

    Starship Troopers?

    Wing Commander?

    Appleseed?

    Serenity?

    Apollo 13?

    Ailens?

    The Great Escape?

    The Guns of Navarone?

    Raiders of the Lost Arc?

    Taken?

    The Kingdom?

    Black Hawk Down?

    Payback?

    Silverado?

    Quigley Down Under?

    The Cutting Edge?

    The Breakfast Club?

    The Underworld Series?

    Enemy at the Gates?

    Saving Private Ryan?

    The Memphis Belle?

    Tora Tora Tora?

    Empire of the Sun?

    Ahh, see there are films in here that only us Dinosaurs might know about as being great box office hits in our day.

    Got one more for you that was criticized by its critics.

    Ladyhawk!

    Music was not that great, but the film was very well done.

    Come to think of it, I'll even bet you were the type to complain about how Lord of the Rings ended. Yeah, that would be where the books ended!

    January 4, 2010 at 4:37 am | Report abuse |
  7. Courtney

    I'm a 27 year old in love with the Twilight saga, and no, I have no crazy crush on any of the too young for me stars of the film. But no, I didn't vote in this.

    I don't like Megan Fox though, I don't think she is sexy, AT ALL. She might be the worst actress of this year, but Kirsten Dunst is definetly one of the worst actresses of all time.

    January 2, 2010 at 2:18 am | Report abuse |
  8. Nick

    No worries,

    Once she:

    a. Hits 40

    b. Her boobs start to sag a little

    She'll be headed to Broadway in an instant.

    then when she's older, having survived off- Broadway and then on (if she gets her chops up) she'll get to play mom to the next hot girl out of filmdom.

    January 1, 2010 at 11:18 pm | Report abuse |
  9. Mary Ann Hoogeveen

    She is a younger and prettier version of Jolie and she does have a better shape,not all skin and bones.Neither one are good actresses.I think everyone knows how they got where they are.

    January 1, 2010 at 10:45 pm | Report abuse |
  10. Eric M.

    Megan Fox proves that good looks = lousy personality. What's
    with her potty mouth and attitude? The tatoos did NOTHING to enhance her looks either. Better left to sailors and side shows.
    Megan nees to get over herself...

    January 1, 2010 at 2:23 am | Report abuse |
  11. cn

    TJ Holmes

    Lady Gaja

    Holly Hunter in "Saving Grace"

    The Wrestler

    The Best

    January 1, 2010 at 12:19 am | Report abuse |
  12. cn

    No Not Megan Fox.

    Penelope Cruz maybe..YES

    Fox is nothing to get excited about. Can't act. Her personality is about as exciting as my big toe.

    January 1, 2010 at 12:13 am | Report abuse |
  13. Vincent

    I find Jake Gyllenhaal and Keira Knightly a lot more 'hot', attractive...physically aswell as in acting

    Megan Fox made me dislike Transformers even more, and since action movies arent really my genre (More of a Drama/docu lover) I think Ill stay away from the next one ^^

    December 31, 2009 at 8:15 pm | Report abuse |
  14. Aaron

    Twilight....go away.

    December 31, 2009 at 7:53 pm | Report abuse |
  15. RS1981

    I liked Transfomers 2, but I think Star Trek or one of the other movies should've gotten that award. Star Trek alone made fans out of people who have never had an interest in the popular franchise. One of my friends went to see it (he's 38 and never watched Star Trek a day in his life), and he loved it. It was amazing how many people I found that are now getting into it, just off of that movie alone, and they're craving more of it. I am however sick and tired of hearing about Twilight and the movies related to it. I have no desire to see it or read the books. I'm the same way with the Harry Potter franchise. As for Kristen Stewart, I'm sorry but I think she sucks. I've thought that since the movie The Panic Room. I'd like to see Zoe Saldana get a good nod in for either Star Trek or Avatar. That girl can act, and I've liked her since Pirates of the Carribean: The Curse of the Black Pearl. By the way can anyone explain to me how someone like Robert Pattinson can be considered attractive ? Just from looking at the pictures of the people from Twilight, I think Taylor Lautner is a total babe and has it over Robert any day of the week.

    December 31, 2009 at 6:22 pm | Report abuse |
    • rebecca

      I have to agree with you here. I have no desire to read the Twilight books or see the movies. I'm 100% anti-Twilight. Kristen Stewart is a terrible actress and isn't all that pretty either. Also, I've only seen the 1st Transformers only because it was on TNT last week, and Megan Fox is so terrible that I really have no desire to see the 2nd one either. Also, my father has been a Star Trek fan since it came out in the early 60s. He dragged me to see the movie in theaters and I actually liked it. I can't wait for the next one. And lastly, I agree with you that Robert Pattinson is not attractive at all, I just don't see it.

      June 20, 2010 at 3:38 am | Report abuse |
  16. alumette

    She looks just like Courtney...can't think of her last name. She does the "cougar show" and she was on "friends" ...is it Cox? That girl is a pretty good actress though. Amanda, not so much. She could stick to modeling and looking pretty. Sometimes, it is enough.

    December 31, 2009 at 1:30 pm | Report abuse |
  17. Chatchic

    The Twilight Saga is awesome. I so can't wait until June 30 for Eclipse to open up and I am not a teeny bopper!

    December 31, 2009 at 1:15 pm | Report abuse |
  18. Meagan's Not Foxey

    I've been telling people shes a horrible actress for years now. Dont get me wrong shes freaking hot, i mean i like looking at her, still she does beat Rashida Jones (you decide). Anyway havent seen avatar so i cant make an assumption, ive always hated transformers and Labeouff, or however you spell that guys name. Star trek rock, and district 9 was to die for.

    December 31, 2009 at 1:06 pm | Report abuse |
  19. Laura

    Megan Fox cannot act and if you look at her closely, she's got nasty skin. I'm so over this girl. Let's move on.

    December 31, 2009 at 1:05 pm | Report abuse |
  20. Grant

    HMMM who do you poll? because you did not poll me, I read that people voted New Moon the best movie of the year? I saw New Moon and the acting was horrible the movie was a total bore! Transformers wasn't great, but where was the nod for Harry Potter? That was a completely enjoyable film.
    I agree Megan Fox is no great actress, Kristen Stewart is Horrible, I would say best actress award goes to Dakota Fanning. So in sumarry please no more sequeals to transformers and definatley no more sequeals to the twilight franchise for the love of all tha's good...or invest in acting school for your actors.

    December 31, 2009 at 12:43 pm | Report abuse |
  21. sMEGMA

    Since when is acting the most important part about making movies?! It's all about making money, period! If you make a film with the best actors, and best of plots, chances are, no one will see it.
    Same goes for today's music, which by the way is total crap...but it does sell big, to audiance whose standards for taste are lower than low, and IQ equals that of average earthquake...5...

    December 31, 2009 at 11:46 am | Report abuse |
  22. Francisco

    I think the honor of worst actress should go to Natalie Portman rather than Megan. Natalie is absolutely atrocious !!!

    December 31, 2009 at 11:41 am | Report abuse |
  23. Adam

    Really? Twilight won? Megan Fox is a better actress than Kristen Steward AND Robert Pattinson combined, and she still is the worst of the year. I'm questioning the type of people who did the voting. I'm thinking teenagers were heavily involved. Only such a demographic could skew Twilight to the best picture spot.

    When actors fail in their roles, I blame the director solely. It is his job to direct the actors and get them through their scenes. If the scenes sucked, it was the director who failed to direct the actors to get some lessons.

    December 31, 2009 at 11:38 am | Report abuse |
  24. dahn

    I always thought Kristen Stewart was a terrible actress, but she was actually very, very good in Adventureland. Goes to show that with decent material she might actually have some chops.

    December 31, 2009 at 11:24 am | Report abuse |
  25. Chasaty

    Ok. I liked Twilight, Star Trek, Avatar, and Transformers. Im not a teeny bopper and im not swooning over Edward. Its not a shock that in Hollywood that actors and actresses alike get picked because they look good. DUH! Its Hollywood. Plus it happens with musical acts as well. So many "rock stars" can't sing or perform but they look good so they get sales.

    Avatar was my favorite though. Just because you don't like a movie, doesn't make it dumb.

    December 31, 2009 at 11:18 am | Report abuse |
  26. Danny

    Megan Fox is an awful actress. No question. But so is Kristen Stewart. They both need to find different careers. Fast.

    December 31, 2009 at 11:14 am | Report abuse |
  27. Timothy James

    Worst movie of the year? The last Harry Potter installment. When will we stopped being punished with these Potter movies? the cast is too old for the story line. If you want to keep the same actors, then bring in a much darker storyline geared towards adults.

    December 31, 2009 at 11:09 am | Report abuse |
  28. marv

    Megan Fox can't act, but looks great! Kristen Stewart makes Megan Fox look like Katherine Hepburn and seems to be on the verge of going to sleep in every scene. Tranformers was poo...Avatar was great and Twilight is for teeny boppers and pathetic stay at home moms.

    December 31, 2009 at 11:06 am | Report abuse |
  29. Mo

    Like this suprises anyone. She is a horrible actress. Just another sad example that looks can get you anywhere. :(

    December 31, 2009 at 11:03 am | Report abuse |
  30. Bagu

    Megan is eye-candy. She needs to step up her actiing resume and skills, otherwise she might as well reserve her Playboy spread with Hef.

    December 31, 2009 at 11:03 am | Report abuse |
  31. Michelle

    Being a woman myself, I think Megan Fox is absolutely stunning. Sure she's not got alot upstairs, but daaaaam she is GORGEOUS! I hope to see her in more movies just so I can look at her rockin' body some more!!

    December 31, 2009 at 10:54 am | Report abuse |
  32. Kanishk

    The whole poll seems like a joke. Transformers was ahead of Star Trek and D-9 ? How on earth is that possible ? And Twilight:New Moon, the best movie. Are you kidding me ? Seems to me like the polling audience was made up of girls and boys in their teens. Please, Avatar is not even in the same league as these movies, that should have been the best movie hands down.

    December 31, 2009 at 10:49 am | Report abuse |
  33. saneOne

    This makes sense if you keep in mind that the fan base for these movies are teenagers and adolescences. Logic has nothing to do with it. Its all hormones.

    December 31, 2009 at 10:49 am | Report abuse |
  34. Bob Dog

    Where is Zooey Deschanel when you need her?

    (Hint, we need a little Zooey right now.)

    December 31, 2009 at 10:46 am | Report abuse |
  35. LOGAN

    Transformers was sick. Megan Fox is so hot and makes transformers even better by gracing the screen with her. She looks amazing even when she is being chased and is covered in dirt and cuts. And tranformers was nasty there better be a sequal, cuz even though your all haters you'll still go see it thats why it made 830 million

    December 31, 2009 at 10:45 am | Report abuse |
  36. JPX

    Wow, I just don't understand the popularity of the Twilight films – I mean, they're just awful. If you want to see a quality vampire flick check out Let the Right One In.

    December 31, 2009 at 10:40 am | Report abuse |
  37. Samone

    I think of thirty even worse female actresses. I agree that she is the sexiest, but most definitely not the worse. How about Kristen... That entire Twilight Saga was ruined because of the actors. The books were great and fabulous, but the movies make me want to GAG
    at the series because of the whole craze on two of the worst actors that I have ever seen–Kristen and Robert Pattinson, who could be placed under the categories of the ugliest and worst actors EVER.

    December 31, 2009 at 10:36 am | Report abuse |
  38. Myron

    "This poll leads me to believe that moviegoers would have been just as happy if “Transformers” just had action-packed scenes of stuff blowing up along with Megan Fox in a non-speaking part."

    I believe you are correct, sir. This sums up the tastes of many American movie-goers.

    December 31, 2009 at 10:36 am | Report abuse |
  39. Michael

    I could care less whether Megan can act or not. She is absolutely gorgeous! They could make a whole movie of her just standing on a staircase looking hot and I would watch it. Any lady that plays video games that is in the spotlight is automatically on the top of my list!

    December 31, 2009 at 10:35 am | Report abuse |
  40. doris

    Worst actress: Kristen Stewart. OMG! she is as stiff and lifeless as a board.

    December 31, 2009 at 10:29 am | Report abuse |
  41. Steve

    She had a speaking role in Transformers? I didn't notice that.

    December 31, 2009 at 10:26 am | Report abuse |
  42. Ed Tallahassee

    Well I think you would have to look at the Percentage that they won by. If Transformers won with 15% of the vote for Worst movie, and also won with 15% of the vote for Best Action film. 15% of the voters love the move and 15% hate the movie. That could easily happen.

    Also with Megan Fox she is really pretty, but that doesn't mean she is a good actress. So I could think she is the pretty and a bad actress. So I could vote for her in both catagories pretty easily.

    I think that the numbers would speak for themselves, but you don't get to see the numbers, you just get to see the winners.

    December 31, 2009 at 10:24 am | Report abuse |
  43. jmason1984

    It's similar to the fall of Rome, society is more interested in aesthetic beauty than substance. Avatar is a film of substance versus Twilight being idiotic teen dribble, and in my opinion placing the feminist movement back. A woman pining over a man, going to a point where she hurts herself to get his attention. As for Megan Fox, eye candy with nothing else going for her. Sadly her best performance to date was her appearance on the television show Supernatural. As for the comparison of Megan Fox to Angelina Jolie is a joke. Granted Angelina Jolie is eye candy but more importantly the woman has talent. She is a dedicated method actress which makes her performance one of substance rather than merely aesthetics. I posit that Megan Fox is not the next Angelina Jolie but the next Pamela Anderson. We don't need a new Angelina Jolie for another ten years but look on the bright side or cringe we've got the next Pamela Anderson.

    December 31, 2009 at 10:17 am | Report abuse |
  44. Jason

    Best Movie I saw – Inglourious Basterds – Great writing, great action and Mélanie Laurent was gorgeous. Movies shouldn't just be eye candy. Maybe thats why I read more books a year then go out to the movies.

    Sherlock Holmes was a great movie as well. It had a great plot and was a great looking movie. And as a straight, married, male, Robert Downey Jr looks great!

    December 31, 2009 at 10:17 am | Report abuse |
  45. Rick

    Guy B wrote:
    Transormers – Hardware Movie
    Star Trek – Hardware Movie
    Avatar – Hardware Movie
    Twilight – Vampire Movie
    "They are what they are, hardware and vampire that shows young hot bodies in situations we all dream of fess up yes you all wish you could do these things in rl"

    Has this guy even seen Avatar because i dont know what kinda hot bodies he's seen in that movie. Dumbest statement i've ever read

    December 31, 2009 at 10:14 am | Report abuse |
  46. Shondell Baker

    I love you Megan

    December 31, 2009 at 10:07 am | Report abuse |
  47. Bocaj77

    I have been a fan of Transformers since the 80's cartoon and I cant believe the bad reviews it got. I thought it was great, better then the first movie. The cartoon movie still being the best of all of them. As for Megan Fox didnt even care they could have put Susan Boyle in her role. The movie is about the Autobots & Decepticons

    December 31, 2009 at 10:03 am | Report abuse |
  48. Ken

    How anyone could say that Avatar was a snoozer... I just do not understand. Avatar is a timeless movie. It can speak to all societies anywhere in the world. It is a story of imperialism and relocation... Man's greed and the extent they will go to just to make a dollar... If we looked at our own history we would see the same story... I love the way Cameron was able to tell the story in a way that people would not leave the theater and go... "Ehhh!!" Some could call it a tree hugger movie... but so what? There are many societies that respect and understand nature far better than we do... I think the only part of the movie I did not like was that I painted the military in a bad light... however it just gave the military their historical role in these situations

    December 31, 2009 at 10:01 am | Report abuse |
  49. Joane in Cleveland

    I forgot about Inglourious Basterds. I loved it. I have seen it 3 times and just can't get enough. We will probably spend NY Eve watching our favorite movies. My grandchildren 7, 3, 20 mos will probably want to watch Harry Potter. That's fine with us. My grandson reads the books and has been reading them since he turned 6. At 7, he is now reading the original Pinocchio and other classics.

    December 31, 2009 at 9:57 am | Report abuse |
  50. Johnny

    Transformers 2 very entertaining as in ACTION...I like it better than part one for the fact that there were more robots and action...Granted the potty mouths outta some of them could have been done without cause kids watch this...My son is 6 and has a ton of Transformer Toys...Since part one came out, he hasn't stopped about them lol...As far as acting goes, action movies do well without it...

    Can't comment on any other movie because i hadnt seen none

    December 31, 2009 at 9:53 am | Report abuse |
  51. Squeeky

    Megan Fox... Her acting skills are horrible... Ive seen Better acting from 7 year old girls who have a tooth missing and speak with a LISP.
    She will eventually flame out and move to the career she belongs in...
    Porn... (She has All the necessary requirements...)
    "Hot": Check.
    Cheesy Acting Ability: Check.
    Wh-o-re: Check.

    December 31, 2009 at 9:53 am | Report abuse |
  52. Ian

    Avatar is in a whole category by itself when taking into account the awesome 3D aspect. Avatar was still better than all those other movies (Maybe on a "best of all time" list), but you wind up with Twilight winning when all of the voters are apparently 13 year old girls.

    December 31, 2009 at 9:53 am | Report abuse |
  53. dhaver

    She has cat like green eyes, stunning dark hair, great body, perfectly chisled lips and nose. So who cares about acting ? As a grown man, I don't need to watch something as idiotic as Transformers – she has plenty of pictures of herself online- which is fine.

    December 31, 2009 at 9:50 am | Report abuse |
  54. Joane in Cleveland

    I have seen both Transformers and Star Trek. I saw ALL the movie and can make an intelligent, hopefully, critique. I did not see 30 mins of Star Trek and guesstimate. The movie is so good(at 60, I am a die hard Star Trek fan of the 60's), I have seen it 6 times. I loved it. Then, again, I loved district 9 and Watchmen, among others. I have always been a major fan of the 'Vampire genre' but you could not pay me to watch 'Twilight' unless one of my 4 grandchildren's lives were in peril.

    December 31, 2009 at 9:48 am | Report abuse |
  55. bigdaddi3113

    Oh, and one more thing before I go - Transformers, Twilight - HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

    Awesome New Year everyone!

    December 31, 2009 at 9:42 am | Report abuse |
  56. Lauren

    "what can only be described as voter schizophrenia"

    If you're going to make an unfunny joke about a serious mental illness, at least pick the right one. Schizophrenia is when you hallucinate sounds or images. Idiot.

    December 31, 2009 at 9:42 am | Report abuse |
  57. bigdaddi3113

    Twilight was the best movie of the year? According to whom? Hamsters?

    December 31, 2009 at 9:39 am | Report abuse |
    • rebecca

      Good one. This made me chuckle. I haven't seen any of the films or read the books, but this was a good joke.

      June 20, 2010 at 3:39 am | Report abuse |
  58. James B. Robinson III

    First off, Megan Fox is NOT an actress... She is a pretty piece of fluff put into a movie for the T&A factor. Name ONE film, tv spot, or ANYTHING that she showed the slightest tallent other then bending over in a low cut top or shaking her can... Pathetic! She will be long forgotten in less then two years, another sorry case of Hollywood trying to sell a no tallent twit to the masses.

    December 31, 2009 at 9:32 am | Report abuse |
  59. Laura

    As for the comments on Kristen being depressed in New Moon... ummm... Have you read the book?? She was depressed basically in the entire book but the end... I understand criticizing her acting but don't come down on her for acting the way the book was written...

    December 31, 2009 at 9:30 am | Report abuse |
  60. jaimeh

    Twilight, what can I say ,,, I saw it because I had a date that wanted to see it. I didn't care for it. Actually, it was boring and with bad actors as well.

    December 31, 2009 at 9:24 am | Report abuse |
  61. luckystarr

    Yes New Moon was an okay movie, but nothing compared to the books. They never are anything compared to the books. Kristin Stewat deserved to receive the worst actress award. I had to turn away most times she came on the screen in New Moon.

    December 31, 2009 at 9:18 am | Report abuse |
  62. Zork

    Wait...she's an ACTRESS? When did that happen?

    December 31, 2009 at 9:12 am | Report abuse |
  63. Sam

    I have boycotted all Twilight books and movies and merchandise. I have not purchased or read a single copy. I understand that movies need to promote in order to garner interest and attendence, but I find the bloated media campaign to leave such a sour taste in my mouth that even I can not handle ingesting anything so commercialized.

    December 31, 2009 at 9:09 am | Report abuse |
  64. Jeffro

    This is so funny! Transformers 2 was so bad it was stunning that they threw out everything they created in the first movie. It was a turkey and all acted bad, but you cant blame the eye candy. The worst acting in the movie was John Turturro. Completely shameless. Too many haters on her. I dont get it. I will give it that it had stunning cgi and amazing sound, but that is it.

    The Twilight movie the best? Even more laughable. It goes to show how bad tastes are these days and marketing influences winning. It is about box office numbers and not great movies. It is no wonder they cant come up with an original movie anymore and need to steal from successful tv shows, made up hollywood endings on real events, or bad books.

    December 31, 2009 at 9:09 am | Report abuse |
  65. Cyber

    Avatar was MUCH better than Transformers 2

    December 31, 2009 at 8:33 am | Report abuse |
  66. vette88

    The people who voted that Megan can't act are either:

    1. Jealous she isn't his/her's

    2. Jealous because they don't have her looks

    What a bunch of crap that she can't act.

    December 31, 2009 at 8:33 am | Report abuse |
  67. Chris Flavin

    It's a good thing for Megan that she's good looking, because if she were to rely on her acting ability, she would be slinging burgers at McDonalds.

    December 31, 2009 at 8:27 am | Report abuse |
  68. Say it like it is

    She is very bangable. What else matters..

    December 31, 2009 at 8:12 am | Report abuse |
  69. Debra R

    Megan Fox: Duh, she doesn't need to act as long as men and gay women will pay to see her

    Star Trek: a good movie...but not the best of the TREK movies

    December 31, 2009 at 8:04 am | Report abuse |
  70. Avatar

    First off, Kristen Stewarts acting in the twilight movies is right on par. That is the unfortunate part. The character is moody, depressing, and completely dependent on Edward Cullen. That is exactly how she plays it. If you don't like that then don't watch the movie.

    Second, Megan Fox IS a horrible actress. She has some sex appeal but the majority of it is makeup. Personally I would rather hook up with Angelina Jolie, Nicole Kidman, or a slew of other actrresses that have total sex appeal and the ability to act. I find personality to be far more sexy and she is a dead fish in that category.

    Third, Transformers 2 was far better than the first movie in my opinion although it still was a bad movie. I'm still pissed that Michael Bay went with the new painted flame Optimus instead of the original Mack Truck. He had a crappy old camaro and then Bumblebee changed into the new one. How come he couldn't do that for the first movie regarding Optimus? And he chose to do that simply because he thought the flames were cool. A little more thought into is all that I would request. Maybe taking a poll before he started designing him would have satisfied me.

    And finally, of the 4 movies, District 9 would win best picture for Originality, Star Trek would win best picture for successful reinvention, and Avatar should have won best picture overall. The critics are far off point with Avatar. It had a deep enriching story despite the fact that it had elements of many movies. But considering everything has just about been done, it is only understandable that the movie would have many elemenets as such. I have a feeling movie critics are not going to be happy for a very LONG while which just tells me to ignore the morons. The sound, graphics, story, character development, storyboard transition, and design of the entire movie was top par and well worth the money. And I paid 20 dollars for the ticket!

    December 31, 2009 at 7:28 am | Report abuse |
  71. Psyrinn04

    I recall her even saying that in Transformers it was just all about running and screaming. Anyone can do that. But her emotions was there. For what she had to do, I think she did great. Kristen Stewert on the other hand, I have watched most of her movies and she is just...there. To put it nicely. I'm anxious to see her in the Runaways. Giving that I am a hopeful person that she won't tear Joan Jett.

    December 31, 2009 at 7:16 am | Report abuse |
  72. Jen

    Can't wait for the movie about fighting giant robots at mute bikini beach... coming soon to a theater near you.

    December 31, 2009 at 7:15 am | Report abuse |
  73. Serinanth

    Twilight did not have any vampires in it, only glitter fairies...
    Avatar wins in my book. Cameron made Bay look like the noob that he is.
    And Megan Fox? Eh, wouldn't throw her outa bed but I would not call her sexiest.

    December 31, 2009 at 7:14 am | Report abuse |
  74. Katie

    Agreed with Melise. Other than that, not all women are famous for just being sexy, don't mistake my words. Theres some wonderful actresses out there who are sexy and have talent. Alot of women are famous for their looks though nowadays, unfortunately.

    I do agree with this opinion to an extent though but I think it should have been a tie between Megan and Kristen Stewart

    December 31, 2009 at 6:42 am | Report abuse |
  75. Melise

    I'm just misspelling a lot today LOL. I meant "spelled"

    December 31, 2009 at 6:42 am | Report abuse |
  76. Melise

    sorry spelt her name wrong, meant Kristen. Its because my cousin spells it with an 'I'

    December 31, 2009 at 6:41 am | Report abuse |
  77. Melise

    I'm going to have to say Kristin Stewart was just as bad as Megan if not worse. People only say she's good because dumb ass females will start saying there's sexism going on.

    As for twilight, I'm glad to see people who aren't horny preteens and teens in the comments talking about how great twilight is, yet being unable to give a good valid reason why twilight was good in their opinion [besides lookers as actors/actresses and sparkly vampires] . I respect that everyone has a different opinion but I just can't believe how far some people's standards of a good movie have lowered. Consider that most of the people who voted best movie as twilight were preteens and teens [occasionally young adults and few older women but yeah]. Kids are very impressionable and will like anything almost that has a good looking actor, anything that seems like its the "in" thing to like or anything that seems like it has a 'bad boy' type in it. This is because these young girls want to fit in and for the ones who don't, they don't know what good acting or what a good movie is yet. As for young adults, they just want something to entertain them whether in a good way or bad way [either that or they never seen a good movie before]. There's no excuse for the very few older women. All I have to say is the acting was bad, the vampires were lame and the supernatural aspect was just adding for more viewers.

    December 31, 2009 at 6:35 am | Report abuse |
  78. birdy

    puuulllleeeeaaazzz.. marilyn monroe was put in all kinds of movies but could never act a lick. EVERYONE knows that. she played a good ditzy broad because she was a ditzy broad.. no acting involved.

    and who the heck is comparing megan fox to angelina jolie? first of all, angelina jolie sucked as an actress when she was younger. she got recognized when she played a psycho.. basically playing herself. only psychos kiss their brothers, steal other people's men, and where viles of their blood around their necks.

    December 31, 2009 at 6:03 am | Report abuse |
  79. Shane McGuire

    Twilght??? Uh Yeah whatever! I can't even call the Twilight films good Vampire Movies at all. Heck even Van Helsing was a better Vamp Film than Twilight. And... I didn't like it as well as the Underworld Series or the Blade Series.

    Nothing I like better than a good Vamp Hunt Flick, but the Twilight Series has some stepping up to do at this point.

    My wife drug me into that film and UGGGG. I fell asleep mainly because both films are too slow. If we are going to hunt Blood Suckers, then lets hunt them.

    Waiting to see how Daywalkers is going to turn out. trailers look promising.

    As for Avatar, well regardless of the movie's messages, I was rooting for the Joes!

    December 31, 2009 at 5:58 am | Report abuse |
  80. paul

    She is not only talentless, but stupid and annoying girl ...

    December 31, 2009 at 4:20 am | Report abuse |
  81. laila

    MEGAN FOX . GO FOR ADULT MOVIES !!! YOU WILL SHOW YOUR REAL TALENT ...

    December 31, 2009 at 4:18 am | Report abuse |
  82. Lainie

    What I can't figure out is how Twilight, with writing that appears to be done furtively in sophomore English and kept in the back of a TrapperKeeper, and worse acting, is on the list, while _Half-Blood Prince_, solidly written and with some of the best actors in the business, wasn't on the list.

    I despair for this generation...

    December 31, 2009 at 3:57 am | Report abuse |
  83. Matthew Lindsley

    I won't nessarilly say she is the worst, but she is deffinately bad, and she is definately NOT the sexiest. Who makes up these things anyway???

    December 31, 2009 at 3:18 am | Report abuse |
  84. Jason

    Who watches Megan Fox Movies for her acting abilities?

    December 31, 2009 at 3:05 am | Report abuse |
  85. Jager

    I'm sorry – I don't understand the title of the article... I hadn't realized Megan Fox WAS an actress....

    December 31, 2009 at 2:46 am | Report abuse |
  86. kristi

    Kristin Stewart (Twilight) is absolutely horrific and she ruins the movies for people who aren't mega fans to begin with.
    As for Megan Fox... She's obviously beautiful, but she's also totally bizarre. Almost as difficult to understand as Sarah Palin... almost.

    December 31, 2009 at 2:42 am | Report abuse |
  87. Maria

    When I go to see transformers I go to see a movie based on a toy with awesome action packed scenes and amazing cg robots. People can vote it worst movie all they want because they are disappointed it doesn't have some crazy philosophic plot but really, who goes to see transformers for the plot? The fact that it earned that much money in the box office speaks for itself. It's no oscar winner, but it's a fun and entertaining movie. Either way, yes Megan could use some acting lessons, but she wasn't as bad as people make her out to be. I've seen plenty of wose actors and actresses. And you can see that with time she's just going to get better and better.

    I think my fav. movie of the year was Star Trek. I love Star Trek anyway and the movie just opened a whole new rebirth of the franchise. It was so well done!

    Sherlock Holmes, I thought, was very good!

    Personally I'm super disappointed with the movies of Twilight. The first book was decent and fun to read, the second was kind of like a depressed teenage angst drama but was still interesting. With the third, it was okay. and with the fourth, it was like reading a horrible fanfiction. And the movies on top of the series are just ridiculous. First of all, none of the characters look like what she described in the books. Since when did Rosalie, who is supposed to pass as a high school student, look like she was middle aged. Edward, to my knowledge, was supposed to have a copper colored hair. (not to mention that everyone thinks this guy is the hottest thing since sliced bread and yet I think he is most definatly NOT the most handsomest guy I've ever seen...the forehead and the cheekbones and the lips = bleh. But that's just my opinion) Bella was a plain-jane average type of gal. Just watching the trailers for the movies, first for twilight and then for new moon, just make me cry.
    Not only are the characters not who they are supposed to be, but the acting is just so bad. I couldn't bring myself to even watch them. I'll stick to the books and even then I can't read them over again.

    December 31, 2009 at 2:06 am | Report abuse |
  88. Vicky B

    Cari, hon... I suppose most Twilight fans are sick of people like YOU, as well, so get use to it because Twilight and its' sequels are NOT going to go away any time soon.

    Maybe instead of critiquing movies, you should try your hand at sports.

    December 31, 2009 at 1:27 am | Report abuse |
  89. Mike

    You guys are something else!! I am reading these cuz I'm bored out of my mind in Iraq right now so decided to come to work and catch up on my to do list.

    1. None of you have anything to do with judging who a good actor is or isn't. Just because you've watched a movie or two doesn't make you a film critic. If it did, you'd be getting paid for it. I've had sex a couple of times, it doesn't make me a porn star.

    2. If she's a bad actor why is she in a movie. She made more money taking a crap in between sceens that we all did working all year. I mean think about it!!! Seriously, she isn't doing too bad for what she's doing if she's getting paid a lot more than I did. Stop hating...

    3. I think we all have better things to do that to complain about stuff like this. I think we should all go the the convenience store, buy a permanent marker, and start putting stupid complaints/comments on public bathroom stall cuz this is exactly what this is!!!

    SGT Gonzalez, Tallil, Iraq...I'm out!!!

    December 31, 2009 at 1:25 am | Report abuse |
  90. Gonzo

    Like, who cares!! Like don't watch it if you don't like it!! Like all of you are stupid!!

    December 31, 2009 at 1:13 am | Report abuse |
  91. lasparky11

    She may not be a very good actress, but she looks great doing it!
    Besides with her money she could retire now and never have to work again.

    December 31, 2009 at 12:39 am | Report abuse |
  92. Angela

    I LOVED Transformers (1 and 2). I would much rather watch action movies and stuff getting blown up than some sappy teen-angst movie that is completely predictable with overdone characters and plot lines. At least Transformers is true to the original and unique. It is also groundbreaking in CGI affects, and in gaining cooperation from not only GMC but the military as well. I really liked Megan Fox in the movies – yeah it's not Oscar worthy but neither is role. As far as action movies go I thought she was fine, I can think of other actors/actresses that are a lot worse than she. In interviews I've seen she seems more intelligent and well-spoken than the role was neccessarily written. Back off people – she's young, beautiful and more successful than anyone writing these comments (myself included) so she most be doing something right!

    December 31, 2009 at 12:33 am | Report abuse |
  93. Pauline

    i dont think megan fox is that bad. but she still needs to work more on her acting skills.

    December 31, 2009 at 12:32 am | Report abuse |
  94. nkdec1

    All you Kristen Stewart haters can bash her all you like, you are obviously in the minority considering the cash cow the Twilight movies have become. It takes people in seats to earn those numbers so a HUGE chunk of the population doesn't agree with you. And FYI teenagers and girls count as "part of the population" so don't lay off the Movie's success on them. Ticket sales are tickets sales, regardless of who buys them. I don't think Kristen Stewart was looking for an Oscar nod for her performance, but I bet she was thrilled with her paycheck!

    December 31, 2009 at 12:18 am | Report abuse |
  95. raycar

    “Megan Fox in a non-speaking part”. Sounds like we are going back to the "What was God thinking when he issued woman a voice box?" mentality. When I jokingly shoot a dig like that to my wife I usually get something shot back. Usually sharp and pointed. However I do admire your sense of adventure. Don't think much of your common sense. A tad dangerous in this "enlightened" world. But live and let live even if it hurts is my belief. By the way does anyone know what God was thinking when he issued woman a voice box?

    December 31, 2009 at 12:17 am | Report abuse |
  96. Amanda

    It should be a tie between kristen and megan. I couldn't even focus on the plot in new moon because of all her blinking and figiting. She detroys the role of bella and should never have been cast. I completely agree that megan fox is terrible and deserves this award. But hollywood is shallow and they cast whom they believe will sell the tickets. And she's hot so she does. But all she will ever be good for are the flashy movies with no meaning.
    Avatar kicked ass. It was not only filled with good acting but had more meaning than "hey lets blow some shit up"
    Twilight and Megan fox make me gag. The end.

    December 31, 2009 at 12:02 am | Report abuse |
  97. krys

    Fox is not that bad at least compared to Kristen Stewart. I love Twilight, but it is painful to watch her act because well, she can't.

    December 30, 2009 at 11:31 pm | Report abuse |
  98. Josh

    i will have to say that i didnt notice anything about mexan fox's acting. I was focused on "other" things while she was on screen. haha

    December 30, 2009 at 11:04 pm | Report abuse |
  99. rachele

    it's really not all that surprising. a woman can definitely be sexy but have no talent. It's a lotcooleif she has some talent. My husband calls this woman the latest member of the whore corps.

    December 30, 2009 at 10:49 pm | Report abuse |
  100. Carlos

    Megan Fox is a terrible actress because she's so hot and superficial. Transformers is the worst movie because it has robots destroying stuff. Twilight is the best movie because it has supernatural beings in the drama of everyday relationships.

    Oh, I get it now. This is how people is trying to feel smarter.

    December 30, 2009 at 10:48 pm | Report abuse |
  101. Janet

    Megan was actually pretty good in Confessions of a Teenage Drama Queen, 2004.

    December 30, 2009 at 10:22 pm | Report abuse |
  102. shaun

    Megan Fox is hot. I don't care about what they say about her.

    December 30, 2009 at 10:21 pm | Report abuse |
  103. Gerry

    My movie pick of the year is Inglorious Basterds.

    Avatar was a snoozer.. District 9 had potential but was missing something.. And Terminator isn't even in my top 10.

    December 30, 2009 at 10:09 pm | Report abuse |
  104. Matthew

    It seems to me that Transformers was one of those films that although many people say they did not like it, privately they think it wasn't the worst film by far this year. Personally, I did not mind the film (at least the action scenes), though there were definitely better action films in 2009 such as Star Trek and Avatar (though I will admit I have yet to see Avatar; even still you don't need to have seen it to know it is a film unlike any other). Twilight is one of those film series I will personally never see nor do I wish and concerning Megan Fox, she certainly is one of those actresses that it mostly for show rather than substance.

    December 30, 2009 at 9:52 pm | Report abuse |
  105. Daniel

    Well that just goes to show that you can't trust who ever was taking the poll then if they voted Twilight the top movie. Seriously? All I know is that those sats lie.

    December 30, 2009 at 9:36 pm | Report abuse |
  106. truthbetold

    I just saw the previews and Megan's acting looked fine there. Is it really that bad?

    December 30, 2009 at 9:26 pm | Report abuse |
  107. alienprophecy

    How can anybody judge her acting abilities based on that idiotic script? Personally, I found Shia L. to be much more annoying. She was at least attractive...but, when it boils down to it, the lines they had made everyone look like a complete moron.

    Consider such zingers as "Do not tell my mother", which couldn't be rescued even by a genius character actor like John Turturro. And, when you stop to think that they ran that line -In The Trailers-...you knew it was going to be bad.

    People are just jealous. She's beautiful, and she's not a bad actress. She's not Angelina Jolie, but she's not bad, either.

    December 30, 2009 at 8:57 pm | Report abuse |
  108. Tom

    I know what movie site I'm staying away from, Moviefone.com - which is apparently where the dopes congregate.

    December 30, 2009 at 8:54 pm | Report abuse |
  109. Steve in PA

    So these are all based off a Moviefone.com website? There are a LOT of other and Better movie sites to go to for info. Rotten Tomatoes and Dark Horizons to name a few.

    Now, is Megan Hot? Yes. Can she Act? Yes. Was the acting good? That's the question. But was everyone elses acting that much better in Transformers 2 then hers? It's an ACTION/COMEDY movie, not some serious drama. Everyones acting was on a so-so performance, so you can't just bash Megan. There was a weak plot and an actor has to do their best, simple as that.

    I guess everyone forgot that Megan was also in Jennifer's Body this year as well. It's funny, that if she is such a bad actress and that movie was soooooo bad. Why was it nearly sold out everywhere I went today? All the Blu-Ray versions were gone and only a few regular DVD's remained. I got the last Blu-Ray at my local Walmart, after Best Buy and Target was sold out completly. The movie wasn't great, but it wasn't horrible either. It was an interesting concept for the horror genre.

    Also, there were what, a good 50+ movies released this year and Megan is the worst actress out of all of them? I really doubt that as I've seen some really bad movies this year. Everyone forget about GIJoe? Now that was some BAD Acting, even if the action and special effects were good.

    Avatar was by far the best movie I have seen in a long time. Star Trek, Terminator: Salvation, District 9, the Proposal and so many other movies were very good. Yes, many people did not like Terminator: Salvation, but I did, because it was a new take on a tired idea.

    I also love Vampire and Warewolves, but have ZERO interest in seeing any of the Twilight movies.

    We go to the Movies for Entertainment, to take us away from the reality of Life and then complain about it afterwards because it wasn't like you wanted it. If you can really do better, why are you complaining here? Go out and make your own movie.

    December 30, 2009 at 8:39 pm | Report abuse |
  110. Rumpleteaser

    I agree Kristin Stewart is a worse actress than Megan Fox. I also agree that Megan Fox would bet better cast as a porn star. If you think Kate Hudson lacks talent, watch her amazing dance scene in 9.

    December 30, 2009 at 8:32 pm | Report abuse |
  111. sally sue

    I thought Megan's acting was a heck of a lot better than Kristen Stewart's acting. She needs to stop acting she ruins every movie she is in.

    December 30, 2009 at 8:24 pm | Report abuse |
  112. nani

    OK, she's gorgeous & sexy & can't act. Not only that, she is such a pseudo poser. She's got this supposed quote from King Lear tattooed on her right shoulder, and the quote is WRONG & changes the meaning of the line. A small thing? sure, but she's posing as to be a smart broad but can't even get the quote right.

    December 30, 2009 at 8:19 pm | Report abuse |
  113. JT

    Transformers was tolerable to watch. To long and drawn out though. The Twilight Saga crap was horrible. I had to get up and leave the Movie Theater halfway through the movie.

    December 30, 2009 at 8:04 pm | Report abuse |
  114. flugel76

    Because there's nothing more exciting than a vampire that has feelings and sparkles in the sunlight......I never thought a franchise could make vampires not-cool. I was sorely mistaken.

    And for the record, not everyone thinks that Megan Fox is the hottest woman on the planet. I think she's a phoney, egotistical debutant, and I personally can't stand her. Give me Shirley Manson or Allison Hannigan anyday.

    December 30, 2009 at 7:59 pm | Report abuse |
  115. Homer

    She may be sexy, but she got some ugly thumbs!

    December 30, 2009 at 7:58 pm | Report abuse |
  116. Lisa-Centereach

    That award should go to Kate Hudson..She has no acting skills at all. It's because of her mother, that people hire her with a glimmer of hope that she has some skills.

    December 30, 2009 at 7:56 pm | Report abuse |
  117. idalia

    I agree Megan and Kristan all so not know how to act!!

    Megan she was well bumble bee did better acting then her!

    Kristan well she looks depressed in the new moon movie..

    so sad that anyone off the street can get a movie role..

    December 30, 2009 at 7:53 pm | Report abuse |
  118. darrel

    Any movie with Megan Fox would be better for much less clothing for her and very little dialogue. Woman loves herself something fierce, but is a physical joy to behold, which explains why she get's any role at all.

    December 30, 2009 at 7:44 pm | Report abuse |
  119. jimvsmij

    My wife and I love the Transformers movies. My wife loves Bumblebee and I love to watch hottie Megan Fox especially in slow motion scenes. I just wished they would make her more like Bumblebee where he has no voice in which to speak.

    December 30, 2009 at 7:43 pm | Report abuse |
  120. ME

    OK So there is something in each one of these movies to be talked about good or bad. But come on you have to admit, its about time they made movies for people to watch instead of all the Stupid Reality CRAP....

    December 30, 2009 at 7:35 pm | Report abuse |
  121. shellys

    Okay,

    Kristin Stewart should have gotten that award. I like Twilight, but hated her with a passion. She ruined the entire series for me. Loved Transformers and the yes, the blue people in Avatar which I thought was a really good movie. Megan at least is pretty. what does Kristin have?

    December 30, 2009 at 7:34 pm | Report abuse |
  122. FactCheck

    Wait, you mean Kristin Stewart's character is NOT supposed to be a brain-less, life-less zombie? She makes Megan Fox look like Helen Mirren.

    December 30, 2009 at 7:34 pm | Report abuse |
  123. coolio

    Since you guys are now talking about twilight i have one thing to say, twilight was the worst movie i had ever seen i mean for goodness sake the actors were horrible i mean horrible. Thank goodness some actors were good looking if not twilight would have gone down the drain.

    December 30, 2009 at 7:26 pm | Report abuse |
  124. Stephanie

    I go what I expected when I went to see the movie, fantasy and entertainment. I enjoyed watching it and I must say that I thought Megan Fox acted appropriately for the role she was given. Sure, she needs to grow, but she will end up getting stuck in teeny bopper movies with bad scripts and no real plot unless her agent gives her some much needed guidance and direction. The fact that she is beautiful shouldn't be held against her and suggesting that she "act" in adult entertainment is disrespectful. Sorry guy, not every hot woman wants to take her clothes off and get f**ked for a living.

    December 30, 2009 at 7:23 pm | Report abuse |
  125. sooz

    Not only is she a horrible actress, she has two brain cells at most!

    December 30, 2009 at 7:20 pm | Report abuse |
  126. Luny

    and what's up with Sigorney Weaver smoking in Avatar? I mean it's what – 2154 and people are still smoking?

    December 30, 2009 at 7:20 pm | Report abuse |
  127. i,robert

    Worst but sexiest actress.....isn't that the requirements for a porn star?

    December 30, 2009 at 7:15 pm | Report abuse |
  128. Luny

    Kristen Stewart should have gotten this award, she has got to be the absolute worst actress ever and for the life of me, I can't figure out how or why she keeps getting cast in movies. She always looks she's trying to remember her lines. Anyone see the SNL spoof on Twilight? It was spot on.

    December 30, 2009 at 7:15 pm | Report abuse |
  129. Marcus

    I'm eagerly awaiting the "Leave Megan Fox Alone!" video on YouTube.

    December 30, 2009 at 7:14 pm | Report abuse |
  130. bodacious leah

    Twilight was phenonmenal. I loved it...even though all the actors were horrible. Transformers was ok...went to the movies at 9:00pm and didnt get out till 12:00am. waste of time. Oh and megan "watever" acting was worthy of slap to her mamma for putting false dreams and hopes in her head. Star Trek was awesome,nothing bad to say. Have not seen Avatar yet but will be going soon! im sure it will exceed my expectations.

    December 30, 2009 at 7:06 pm | Report abuse |
  131. Buster

    Let's see – very sexy but can't act. I hope Jenna Jameson calls Ms. Fox with some profitable career advice.

    December 30, 2009 at 6:43 pm | Report abuse |
  132. KateNAz

    Ha ha-worst than Madonna? The only reason Madonna isn't on this list is because she hasn't released any movies this year.

    December 30, 2009 at 6:43 pm | Report abuse |
  133. george

    Avatar: Which I saw yesterday, is classic Sci-fi writing, combined with state-of-art visuals. And a little Man Called Horse thrown in for good measure. Transformers is bubble gum in comparison.

    December 30, 2009 at 6:43 pm | Report abuse |
  134. Olandoes

    Everytime Megan Fox opens her mouth there was no emotion. She was talking with no feelin at all. That's why I hated her in that movie, if you compare her to the people acting alonside her you can tell her delivery is so flat. Her mannerisms while acting are good, but could someone teach her inflection is and how to use it?

    December 30, 2009 at 6:42 pm | Report abuse |
  135. Euro123

    I gotta agree with this. Megan Fox needs a lot of help. But that's what's going on in America anyway...all you have to be is somewhat attractive, brain and / or talent don't really matter lol

    December 30, 2009 at 6:29 pm | Report abuse |
  136. Jens Jensen

    Transformers was not bad. Well maybe the story was, but the speciel effects were great. And the acting in such a big special effects movie is
    only fill. I hope there will be a Transformers 3. Megan Fox is a sexy girl, nice to look at and that what it is about in this type of movies..
    What did you critics expect ?

    Saw Avatar in the movie theater today. Wonderfull otherworld movie.
    The battle scenes reminded a bit of Camerons Aliens with massive weaponry,more massive in Avatar, but still. I don´t understand why the weaponry wasn´t more advanced. Like lasers and such, which is in full development right now . Look at spacedaily.com In Avatars future society there sure would have been lasers and other weaponry.
    Some of the characters were a bit to predictable like the bulldog who wants to destroy the Nawie..
    The otherworldly scenes though were of an otherworldly beauty. I hope we someday will see some places as a human race, though without destroying it(which is quit difficult if we want to live there.)

    December 30, 2009 at 6:26 pm | Report abuse |
  137. Chirs

    I thought the movie transformers was enteraining. Corny and stupid at parts yes (robot heaven). i mean i am a huge fan of the cartoon as i am sure alot of people who saw it but I just want to go to the movie to be entertained. and for that it did the job. I would not purchase this movie on dvd for more than $10.00 but if i saw it for $9.99 on Blue Ray I would buy.

    as for Megan Fox, i dont think she deserves worst actress title. i have seen far worse this year it just happens she is hot and in a block buster movie so she everyone is infatuated with her which is a total unfair. I hated the Cure becuase everyone i knew liked them, it was not there music that i hated but just the plain fact that everyone liked them and were very popular at the time. it was not until after they faded that i started liking their music. i think its same case here. Haters. In my humble opinion though i am not a fan of hers (only have seen the 2 transformes movies shes been in) She can act ok and she is gorgeous.

    December 30, 2009 at 6:25 pm | Report abuse |
  138. Big Explosions

    Transformers Duha! Cars that shoot and trash things Acting!!!! If you want to compare acting do it with Jessica Simpson in Dukes of Hazzard or another bimbo in a action movie.

    December 30, 2009 at 6:25 pm | Report abuse |
  139. MelawendRider

    People trash or adore wither Angelina and Megan. It's individual preference.

    So give Megan a break. She's far more than eye candy – she also has acting chops, young, still in development, but definitely there. The kissing scenes were too timid, but both Megan and Shia both need to work on that. Megan's performance over dead Shia was dead-on – you could feel the desperation and heartbreak.

    It's too early to make a comparison between Angelina (34) and Megan (23). Angelina is the superior actress. She's had some truly great roles. She's been at it many years longer and grew up in the business, the daughter of an amazing actor.

    It is as Shia said in the first Transformers: "I think there's a lot more than meets the eye with you." I expect well see better work from Megan as she grows as an actress and gets better roles.

    December 30, 2009 at 6:22 pm | Report abuse |
  140. Tony Justin

    2009:
    It was the best of times, it was the worst of times;
    it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the age of Megan Fox, it was the age of Megan Fox...

    December 30, 2009 at 6:19 pm | Report abuse |
  141. Khadijah

    I liked transformers, but my fascination was more with the technical aspects of it. It was pretty clear that the pimps of Hollywood were trying to reinvent Megan Fox as a Playboy Centerfold. One Actor once said when he as recieving an Oscar, "Hollywood tries to make you a whore".

    I think Megan has good potiential, give her time, and try to be nice.

    Khadijah

    December 30, 2009 at 6:11 pm | Report abuse |
  142. UrCrazy

    Avatar def way better than transformers, come on!

    December 30, 2009 at 6:10 pm | Report abuse |
  143. Ace

    It's a sign of our culture that it's OK to see thousands of soldiers killed and some of the greatest monuments of the world destroyed, but for God's sake don't let Megan Fox go topless. Violence good, nudity bad.

    December 30, 2009 at 6:06 pm | Report abuse |
  144. Luke

    Megan Fox cannot act period. (She looks good which will unfortunately keep her around)

    December 30, 2009 at 6:06 pm | Report abuse |
  145. Doesntmatter

    Who cares if she's bad at acting?!

    Don't they know that men only go to her movies just to stare at her amazing hotness?

    December 30, 2009 at 6:03 pm | Report abuse |
  146. Adam

    Her career as a ho-hum mainstream actress ruined Megan Fox's chance of having an extremely successful career in adult entertainment. Dead serious. She'd be so wealthy by now it isn't funny. Instead, she's gonna be a flash in the Hollywood pan.

    December 30, 2009 at 5:58 pm | Report abuse |
  147. Guy B.

    Transormers – Hardware Movie
    Star Trek – Hardware Movie
    Avatar – Hardware Movie
    Twilight – Vampire Movie

    They are what they are, hardware and vampire that shows young hot bodies in situations we all dream of fess up yes you all wish you could do these things in rl.

    We need movies that tell a story, and acting that at the end you say ya!! that was a good movie.

    Megan you do what your paid to do in those movies, look good no where does it say you need to act to be in a hardware movie. Bruce Willis comes to mind in all those hardware movies he made, and that guy just can't act!!!

    December 30, 2009 at 5:58 pm | Report abuse |
  148. Shawnbob

    It's been a while since I've seen a decent action movie.

    Transformers was so bad that all my friends told me they felt like they walked out of the theater with shrapnel in their a**es. I took their advice and won't even rent the video.

    Twilight is great if you're a junior high girl and all it takes to impress you is winking and hair flipping, and you are not annoyed silly by deadpan voiceovers.

    I wasn't impressed with the 3D Amazon smurfs in avatar either. The movie was an otherwise impressive movie with a pathetic script. The plot line was not only predictable, it was like watching a 3 hour cliche', which at some point practically degenerated into a video game commercial.

    Of course I'm wrong because all of these things have made millions and everyone has voted with their wallets proving that if you spend enough to advertise any piece of garbage as the best movie of the year, it will be.

    December 30, 2009 at 5:56 pm | Report abuse |
  149. K

    So silent films for Megan Fox then. Her acting is HORRIBLE. The only reason anyone went to see Transformers was because it was spread around (no pun intended) that she was sitting very "seductively" on a motorcycle. I don't really care for Angelina Jolie either, but at least SHE can act.

    December 30, 2009 at 5:55 pm | Report abuse |
  150. rkersh

    it's all about the bux . . . this country has been dumming down since the 60's so it is reflected in polls such as this . . . dumb tv becomes dumb movie . . . it's a trend, but hey . . . it's all about the bux . . .

    December 30, 2009 at 5:55 pm | Report abuse |
  151. lesley

    seriously...twilight won?! are you kidding.. kristen stewart doesn't know how to act at all... actually most of the actors in that movie can't act...

    December 30, 2009 at 5:54 pm | Report abuse |
  152. Jerry Ferguson

    Let's look at it this way. If the roles were reversed, would Marylin Monroe get a Megan Fox tat? Don't think so...

    December 30, 2009 at 5:54 pm | Report abuse |
  153. Daniel

    Transformers was awful. The jokes were in poor taste, it was pretty racist, and overly sexual for no reason. I dont think Megan Fox is to blame for poor writing and directing. Every Michale bay movie is exactly the same, they blue screen out actors and replace them with Robots and suddenly Bad Boys 2 is Revenge of the Fallen.

    December 30, 2009 at 5:54 pm | Report abuse |
  154. sarah

    I think that the second movie of Transformers was great. As far as Megan Fox goes... all you haters need to grow the hell up and lay off her. She is doing great as far as im concerned. Keep up the good work megan.

    December 30, 2009 at 5:52 pm | Report abuse |
  155. adrienne

    THE WORST? Kristen Stewart. At least Megan Fox is animated, alive, she blinks, she laughs, she cries. Why pick on her? I keep thinking that after seven or eight movies, Kristen's facial expression or voice would change, but nope, nada. Kristen Stewart can not act if her life depended on it.

    December 30, 2009 at 5:51 pm | Report abuse |
  156. Sherry

    Ed: Are you kidding? This was the best Star TreK, next to Kahn

    December 30, 2009 at 5:49 pm | Report abuse |
  157. Lisa

    Do you mean to tell me a woman was picked in Hollywood for looks not talent? When do we woman get the same option – pick men for looks, not talent. I'm tired of these old fogies getting roles into their 80s.

    December 30, 2009 at 5:48 pm | Report abuse |
  158. JBob

    The whole Twilight sagas are the real tragedy as far as acting chops go. Is Megan a bad actress? Her acting was no better or worse than any other means of spiking testosterone in the 10-90 male demographic this year.

    Her speaking out against the movie about low grade acting and pure eye thrills shows there's a brain under the hood, even if it was biting the hand that fed her.

    December 30, 2009 at 5:46 pm | Report abuse |
  159. WooHoo

    In all major action movies, acting is always bad and movies are saved by special effects.

    Avatar is in a new genre altogether.

    December 30, 2009 at 5:43 pm | Report abuse |
  160. ed

    Didn't see Transformers, but I did see the first 30 minutes of Star Trek and it was BAD! Worst movie of the year for me.

    December 30, 2009 at 5:35 pm | Report abuse |
  161. chasemel

    haha really? Megan Fox is getting a bad rap and Twilight is the fave movie and nobody says anything about Kristen Stewart's dead acting?

    December 30, 2009 at 5:35 pm | Report abuse |
  162. Renee

    Who was the judge....let me guess Angelina Jolie?

    December 30, 2009 at 5:34 pm | Report abuse |
  163. Lindsey

    I know Roger Rabbit. He's my friend and a far better actor than Megan Fox.

    December 30, 2009 at 5:30 pm | Report abuse |
  164. Mia

    Kristen Stewart should have gotten that award, without a doubt. Her acting in the Twilight movies are just a trainwreck.

    December 30, 2009 at 5:29 pm | Report abuse |
    • shabaz

      Ha ha ha .. ... Discussing the acting capabilities of Megan Fox and Kristen Stewart is like discussing the intelligence of George W Bush or the Foreign Policy capabilities of Sarah Palin..... They think they have it, but they're the only ones who do....
      By the way , Twilight ... worst series ever.... who wants to watch a bunch gay vampires (no offence to gays) ? Also, is the lead guys hairdo also immortal ? Or is he followed around by a Vampire Hairdresser ?

      November 7, 2010 at 9:06 pm | Report abuse |
  165. Cari

    Gah, I am sick of Twilight and the whole saga. That movie was the biggest waste of 2 hours that I know of, and I am upset that I can't get that time back.

    As far as Megan Fox... yeah, she needs to learn to act. It won't be forever that she can get by on sexy.

    December 30, 2009 at 5:28 pm | Report abuse |
  166. Amy

    Megan Fox is a horrible actress and has the personality to match. She should have stuck with modeling.

    December 30, 2009 at 5:28 pm | Report abuse |
  167. LOL

    LOL TOO FUNNY!!!!!!!!!!!!

    December 30, 2009 at 5:25 pm | Report abuse |
  168. Fernando

    Megan Fox is def gorgeous and nice eye candy while watching Transformers 2. However, I would have to say the acting in was pretty bad overall by all actors/actresses in that movie.

    December 30, 2009 at 5:24 pm | Report abuse |
  169. David

    Who cares....its megan fox.....she doesn't need to act.

    December 30, 2009 at 5:21 pm | Report abuse |
  170. Sherry

    Who did the voting; a group of Teeny- boppers? I mean come on; Transformers was good.........but the pretty actress was bad? Jealous maybe, and my daughter only went to see it because of Shia. As for the new craze, Twilight, every girl under the age of 20 has swoon over this guy, and we all know that. GAG

    December 30, 2009 at 5:16 pm | Report abuse |
  171. Doz

    lol. Worst... yet sexiest. Welcome to America.

    December 30, 2009 at 5:14 pm | Report abuse |
  172. Carlos

    I know Angelina Jolie. Angelina Jolie is my friend. Megan: You are no Angelina Jolie

    December 30, 2009 at 5:07 pm | Report abuse |
  173. Chocolate Milk

    Transformers 2 was poop!!! Megan does need some acting lessons, she won't be able to use her good looks forever. I actually saw her on some television show she used to be on. She was terrible on that as well. It's clear she gets her roles based on looks not talent.

    December 30, 2009 at 4:46 pm | Report abuse |
  174. Victor

    The whole Twilight Saga makes me want to gag. Avatar was definetely a better movie.

    December 30, 2009 at 4:16 pm | Report abuse |

Post a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Advertisement
About this blog

Our daily cheat-sheet for breaking celebrity news, Hollywood buzz and your pop-culture obsessions.