<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where are the good family films?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2008/11/10/where-are-the-good-family-films/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2008/11/10/where-are-the-good-family-films/</link>
	<description>Watch Showbiz Tonight on HLN at 11pm ET/PT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:21:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amelia</title>
		<link>http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2008/11/10/where-are-the-good-family-films/#comment-12626</link>
		<dc:creator>Amelia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 17:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmarquee.wordpress.com/?p=306#comment-12626</guid>
		<description>I wish hollywood producers would see all these comments. They would make a TON more money if they simply produced more wholesome family films.  

I used to love going to the movies a lot, but haven&#039;t gone in years since they&#039;ve gotten so trashy and depressing.  Living wild with so called freedom, hurting others and yourself, doesn&#039;t make you happy--and neither does watching people doing so. 

 I&#039;d rather see people making a difference in the world. Exciting adventures overcoming great obstacles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish hollywood producers would see all these comments. They would make a TON more money if they simply produced more wholesome family films.  </p>
<p>I used to love going to the movies a lot, but haven&#039;t gone in years since they&#039;ve gotten so trashy and depressing.  Living wild with so called freedom, hurting others and yourself, doesn&#039;t make you happy&#8211;and neither does watching people doing so. </p>
<p> I&#039;d rather see people making a difference in the world. Exciting adventures overcoming great obstacles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don of the Dead</title>
		<link>http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2008/11/10/where-are-the-good-family-films/#comment-11809</link>
		<dc:creator>Don of the Dead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmarquee.wordpress.com/?p=306#comment-11809</guid>
		<description>Want great family films?

The Iron Giant
The Princess Bride
The Original Star Wars films</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want great family films?</p>
<p>The Iron Giant<br />
The Princess Bride<br />
The Original Star Wars films</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moviefan</title>
		<link>http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2008/11/10/where-are-the-good-family-films/#comment-11131</link>
		<dc:creator>moviefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 00:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmarquee.wordpress.com/?p=306#comment-11131</guid>
		<description>Another reason why most kids movies, in addition to some summer blockbusters, suck these days is because the producers just want to them marketable. Look at Live Free or Die Hard, a good movie, but it wasn&#039;t the same as the previous Die Hard films. Seeing John McClane not swear anymore was dissapointing, plus the violence was less graphic just because the idiotic producers, who care about nothing but money, wanted a PG-13 action film, instead of being true to the series, and making an R-rated sequel. I hope they don&#039;t do this with Beverly Hills Cop IV coming out in a couple of years. Films like Batman and Robin (one of the worst films of all time), was just made for marketing. It lacked Tim Burton&#039;s dark vision of Batman in the first two films, just because the stupid producers just wanted a Batman film to be more kid-friendly. The writer didn&#039;t focus on the plot by adding unintentionally hilarious and cheesy dialogue for Arnold Schwarzenneger, and the director, Joel Schumacher, did a lazy job directing, just because the crew was being impatient, and was focusing on marketing, while they were filming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another reason why most kids movies, in addition to some summer blockbusters, suck these days is because the producers just want to them marketable. Look at Live Free or Die Hard, a good movie, but it wasn&#039;t the same as the previous Die Hard films. Seeing John McClane not swear anymore was dissapointing, plus the violence was less graphic just because the idiotic producers, who care about nothing but money, wanted a PG-13 action film, instead of being true to the series, and making an R-rated sequel. I hope they don&#039;t do this with Beverly Hills Cop IV coming out in a couple of years. Films like Batman and Robin (one of the worst films of all time), was just made for marketing. It lacked Tim Burton&#039;s dark vision of Batman in the first two films, just because the stupid producers just wanted a Batman film to be more kid-friendly. The writer didn&#039;t focus on the plot by adding unintentionally hilarious and cheesy dialogue for Arnold Schwarzenneger, and the director, Joel Schumacher, did a lazy job directing, just because the crew was being impatient, and was focusing on marketing, while they were filming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jj</title>
		<link>http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2008/11/10/where-are-the-good-family-films/#comment-11130</link>
		<dc:creator>jj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmarquee.wordpress.com/?p=306#comment-11130</guid>
		<description>I thought that everybody was frightened of the flying monkeys in &quot;The Wizard of Oz.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that everybody was frightened of the flying monkeys in &#034;The Wizard of Oz.&#034;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jj</title>
		<link>http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2008/11/10/where-are-the-good-family-films/#comment-11129</link>
		<dc:creator>jj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 23:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmarquee.wordpress.com/?p=306#comment-11129</guid>
		<description>Why not read your children the classics like &quot;Black Beauty,&quot; take them only to movies with quality reviews, go for hikes with them, and do hobbies with them.   Part of the message of &quot;WALL-E&quot; was that the people of Earth became fat and lazy because all they did all the time was watch their screens.  I agree that children do not have to be protected scrupulously from violence (re: &quot;Bambi&quot; and all fairy tales).  They need to learn how to live a full life, and books, quality films, exercise, and pasttimes will all help provide that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not read your children the classics like &#034;Black Beauty,&#034; take them only to movies with quality reviews, go for hikes with them, and do hobbies with them.   Part of the message of &#034;WALL-E&#034; was that the people of Earth became fat and lazy because all they did all the time was watch their screens.  I agree that children do not have to be protected scrupulously from violence (re: &#034;Bambi&#034; and all fairy tales).  They need to learn how to live a full life, and books, quality films, exercise, and pasttimes will all help provide that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2008/11/10/where-are-the-good-family-films/#comment-11116</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmarquee.wordpress.com/?p=306#comment-11116</guid>
		<description>I feel the need to point out that a movie doesn&#039;t have to contain adult situations, language, etc. to actually be good. Making a movie for kids is no excuse for sacrificing quality. It&#039;s horrible that studios take advantage of childrens ignorance to turn a nice profit. Disney and Pixar are more or less the only studios left that actually manage to keep standards up while the rest of the world makes stupid talking animal films over and over and over again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel the need to point out that a movie doesn&#039;t have to contain adult situations, language, etc. to actually be good. Making a movie for kids is no excuse for sacrificing quality. It&#039;s horrible that studios take advantage of childrens ignorance to turn a nice profit. Disney and Pixar are more or less the only studios left that actually manage to keep standards up while the rest of the world makes stupid talking animal films over and over and over again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Lingel</title>
		<link>http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2008/11/10/where-are-the-good-family-films/#comment-11114</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Lingel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmarquee.wordpress.com/?p=306#comment-11114</guid>
		<description>Am I getting something wrong here? Is this guy complaining that children&#039;s movies have lousy scripts? Is he saying Pixar and Disney are just pumping movies out as quickly as possible to make a buck?

Well, to simply answer your question about why scripts for kid&#039;s movies are sub-par . . . they are for kids! Are you really that influenced by what a few critics say? Some of the greatest films of all time were destroyed by critics. And again, we are talking family/children films. You get a group of children to be critics for something like Madagascar and there will be thumbs up all over the place.

Put a child in front of a television playing a movie like The Usual Suspects or Shawshank Redemption and they&#039;ll have no idea what the hell is going on.

Children&#039;s movies are unique. They are special and create worlds that inspire young children to dream and think and be creative. I remember with only the fondest of memories my childhood and my obsession with great films like Aladdin, The Lion King and The Little Mermaid.

These films aren&#039;t meant to be enjoyed by all adults. Clearly, some will absolutely have a great time at the cinema with their children watching something silly like Ice Age and others won&#039;t. It doesn&#039;t mean that it is a bad film.

But the question here is why does it matter if the scripts aren&#039;t Oscar worthy? Who cares? Definitely not the children because they&#039;ll drag you back to the same silly film a dozen times before having you buy them a copy on DVD.

People are thinking too much these days. Let the kid movies be for the kids and if you&#039;re unhappy with the scripts and the dialogue of a movie made for children, go see something more suitable for your age. Don&#039;t complain and rain all over millions of children&#039;s parades by saying their movies are lame. That my friend is lame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I getting something wrong here? Is this guy complaining that children&#039;s movies have lousy scripts? Is he saying Pixar and Disney are just pumping movies out as quickly as possible to make a buck?</p>
<p>Well, to simply answer your question about why scripts for kid&#039;s movies are sub-par . . . they are for kids! Are you really that influenced by what a few critics say? Some of the greatest films of all time were destroyed by critics. And again, we are talking family/children films. You get a group of children to be critics for something like Madagascar and there will be thumbs up all over the place.</p>
<p>Put a child in front of a television playing a movie like The Usual Suspects or Shawshank Redemption and they&#039;ll have no idea what the hell is going on.</p>
<p>Children&#039;s movies are unique. They are special and create worlds that inspire young children to dream and think and be creative. I remember with only the fondest of memories my childhood and my obsession with great films like Aladdin, The Lion King and The Little Mermaid.</p>
<p>These films aren&#039;t meant to be enjoyed by all adults. Clearly, some will absolutely have a great time at the cinema with their children watching something silly like Ice Age and others won&#039;t. It doesn&#039;t mean that it is a bad film.</p>
<p>But the question here is why does it matter if the scripts aren&#039;t Oscar worthy? Who cares? Definitely not the children because they&#039;ll drag you back to the same silly film a dozen times before having you buy them a copy on DVD.</p>
<p>People are thinking too much these days. Let the kid movies be for the kids and if you&#039;re unhappy with the scripts and the dialogue of a movie made for children, go see something more suitable for your age. Don&#039;t complain and rain all over millions of children&#039;s parades by saying their movies are lame. That my friend is lame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allison</title>
		<link>http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2008/11/10/where-are-the-good-family-films/#comment-11065</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmarquee.wordpress.com/?p=306#comment-11065</guid>
		<description>Does anyone else remember &quot;Milo and Otis&quot;? That was a great little movie. 

I think it&#039;s all going to depend on your individual kids. Something that terrifies one kid (like the kids who have nightmares of the flying monkeys in &quot;Wizard of Oz&quot; might have no effect on someone else. 

And to the mother who was appalled by the &quot;fighting&quot; in &quot;Kung Fu Panda&quot; -- really? I&#039;m 30, but I don&#039;t think you have to be that old to pick up that the bad guy was the one who wanted to destroy the village. Fighting for fighting&#039;s sake is stupid, and while I felt my IQ drop a few points while watching the movie, I don&#039;t think the message of rising to the occasion and teammates coming together was a bad thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone else remember &#034;Milo and Otis&#034;? That was a great little movie. </p>
<p>I think it&#039;s all going to depend on your individual kids. Something that terrifies one kid (like the kids who have nightmares of the flying monkeys in &#034;Wizard of Oz&#034; might have no effect on someone else. </p>
<p>And to the mother who was appalled by the &#034;fighting&#034; in &#034;Kung Fu Panda&#034; - really? I&#039;m 30, but I don&#039;t think you have to be that old to pick up that the bad guy was the one who wanted to destroy the village. Fighting for fighting&#039;s sake is stupid, and while I felt my IQ drop a few points while watching the movie, I don&#039;t think the message of rising to the occasion and teammates coming together was a bad thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moviefan</title>
		<link>http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2008/11/10/where-are-the-good-family-films/#comment-11044</link>
		<dc:creator>moviefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 04:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmarquee.wordpress.com/?p=306#comment-11044</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t here during the &#039;70&#039;s and &#039;80&#039;s, but I grew up on films like Star Wars, Raiders of the Lost Ark, and E.T. All three films mentioned are great (the latter two are on among my all-time favorite films). Those movies were not made for children, but for everyone and were made in a way that suprisingly found an audience among children in addition to adults. Nowadays, writers of kids movies write films the wrong way. They write a movie only for kids, then they put silly in-jokes just to please the adults. The only movies successful at doing that were SOME of the Dreamworks animated films (Shrek 1 &amp; 2, Shark Tale, Madagascar, Kung Fu Panda, etc.) The only two Dreamworks films I dislike were Shrek 3 (it was boring and dull), and Bee Movie (which was also boring and dull), which had some adult jokes, that I felt were a little too adult. Just see the movie for yourself. The only company today that makes family movies like the classics I mentioned is Pixar.

I also grew up on many Disney classics (made back when Disney was good) and &#039;90&#039;s kids movies. What I mean by &#039;90&#039;s kids movies are those that weren&#039;t huge at the box office or liked by critics, but one that had a good hidden message, even though many had rude humor, but it was funny. It wasn&#039;t fart or poop jokes every five seconds. Movies I&#039;m talking about are ones like Little Giants, Dennis the Menace, The Mighty Ducks, etc. An underrated one is Heavyweights, made by Disney. Though it had many fat and rude jokes, but it had a very good message about body image. In fact, this had Ben Stiller, before Madagascar and Night at the Museum. It was also co-written by Judd Apatow, who is known obviously for raunchy R-rated comedies like Superbad (which was great, but definately not a family movie). He did a kids movie! And it was good, regardless of what people say. Many of these films are ones families should pick up at the video store, instead of spending $9.50 a person for a piece of garbage like High School Musical 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#039;t here during the &#039;70&#039;s and &#039;80&#039;s, but I grew up on films like Star Wars, Raiders of the Lost Ark, and E.T. All three films mentioned are great (the latter two are on among my all-time favorite films). Those movies were not made for children, but for everyone and were made in a way that suprisingly found an audience among children in addition to adults. Nowadays, writers of kids movies write films the wrong way. They write a movie only for kids, then they put silly in-jokes just to please the adults. The only movies successful at doing that were SOME of the Dreamworks animated films (Shrek 1 &amp; 2, Shark Tale, Madagascar, Kung Fu Panda, etc.) The only two Dreamworks films I dislike were Shrek 3 (it was boring and dull), and Bee Movie (which was also boring and dull), which had some adult jokes, that I felt were a little too adult. Just see the movie for yourself. The only company today that makes family movies like the classics I mentioned is Pixar.</p>
<p>I also grew up on many Disney classics (made back when Disney was good) and &#039;90&#039;s kids movies. What I mean by &#039;90&#039;s kids movies are those that weren&#039;t huge at the box office or liked by critics, but one that had a good hidden message, even though many had rude humor, but it was funny. It wasn&#039;t fart or poop jokes every five seconds. Movies I&#039;m talking about are ones like Little Giants, Dennis the Menace, The Mighty Ducks, etc. An underrated one is Heavyweights, made by Disney. Though it had many fat and rude jokes, but it had a very good message about body image. In fact, this had Ben Stiller, before Madagascar and Night at the Museum. It was also co-written by Judd Apatow, who is known obviously for raunchy R-rated comedies like Superbad (which was great, but definately not a family movie). He did a kids movie! And it was good, regardless of what people say. Many of these films are ones families should pick up at the video store, instead of spending $9.50 a person for a piece of garbage like High School Musical 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2008/11/10/where-are-the-good-family-films/#comment-10192</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmarquee.wordpress.com/?p=306#comment-10192</guid>
		<description>I am not a parent yet myself, but I am a nanny and former teacher, and I can tell you that what kind of media a child is exposed to (and how much) definitely makes a difference. A few years ago, I watched a music video extra on one of the Shrek DVDs with 7 &amp; 9 year-old girls. The 9 year-old was smart enough to figue out that with the song&#039;s rhyming scheme, the next word in the song should have been ass, but was replaced with another word. She thought that it was hilarious, and yelled out. &quot;They should have said &#039;a-s-s&#039;!&quot; (She spelled the word aloud, but wouldn&#039;t actually say it.) It is a minor example, but a good indication of just how little respect Hollywood has for parents and caregivers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not a parent yet myself, but I am a nanny and former teacher, and I can tell you that what kind of media a child is exposed to (and how much) definitely makes a difference. A few years ago, I watched a music video extra on one of the Shrek DVDs with 7 &amp; 9 year-old girls. The 9 year-old was smart enough to figue out that with the song&#039;s rhyming scheme, the next word in the song should have been ass, but was replaced with another word. She thought that it was hilarious, and yelled out. &#034;They should have said &#039;a-s-s&#039;!&#034; (She spelled the word aloud, but wouldn&#039;t actually say it.) It is a minor example, but a good indication of just how little respect Hollywood has for parents and caregivers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
