<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Montauk Monster: A marketing gimmick?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2008/08/12/the-montauk-monster-a-marketing-gimmick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2008/08/12/the-montauk-monster-a-marketing-gimmick/</link>
	<description>Watch Showbiz Tonight on HLN at 11pm ET/PT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:21:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sierramom</title>
		<link>http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2008/08/12/the-montauk-monster-a-marketing-gimmick/#comment-44383</link>
		<dc:creator>sierramom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 20:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmarquee.wordpress.com/?p=114#comment-44383</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s as simple as this...get a DNA sample, and test it.  Then, there will be no need to spend time wondering and guessing what this thing is.  Who knows,  maybe it&#039;s some twisted concoction of a creature due to cell altering polution.  We&#039;re all gonna die!  Give me a break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s as simple as this...get a DNA sample, and test it.  Then, there will be no need to spend time wondering and guessing what this thing is.  Who knows,  maybe it&#039;s some twisted concoction of a creature due to cell altering polution.  We&#039;re all gonna die!  Give me a break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franko</title>
		<link>http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2008/08/12/the-montauk-monster-a-marketing-gimmick/#comment-6506</link>
		<dc:creator>Franko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmarquee.wordpress.com/?p=114#comment-6506</guid>
		<description>Climate Change killed it. Faked out by IPCC climate forecest, 
Monster vacationed into deadly climate. Next are US ?
More CarbonCredit dollars, or extinction here we come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Climate Change killed it. Faked out by IPCC climate forecest,<br />
Monster vacationed into deadly climate. Next are US ?<br />
More CarbonCredit dollars, or extinction here we come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Montauk Monster</title>
		<link>http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2008/08/12/the-montauk-monster-a-marketing-gimmick/#comment-6482</link>
		<dc:creator>Montauk Monster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmarquee.wordpress.com/?p=114#comment-6482</guid>
		<description>We come from a long line of Montauk monsters.  You humans just wait, because we are coming to EAT YOU ALL!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We come from a long line of Montauk monsters.  You humans just wait, because we are coming to EAT YOU ALL!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike S. from Texas</title>
		<link>http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2008/08/12/the-montauk-monster-a-marketing-gimmick/#comment-6471</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike S. from Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 04:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmarquee.wordpress.com/?p=114#comment-6471</guid>
		<description>Carol.... go look at a turtle skeleton and tell me you still think it is a turtle.  Turtle shells are attached to the spinal column of a turtle, it is a part of their skeleton... they can&#039;t lose their shells unless they lose their skeleton.

http://campus.murraystate.edu/academic/faculty/terry.derting/anatomyatlas/entireturtskelamy-becky.html

Turtles do not have teeth.

Turtles do not have external ears.

Turtles do not have hair.

Turtles do not have ribcages (their shell acts as the support structure)

I am literally astounded at how many people actually think it could even possibly be a turtle.

Dental morphology as well as skeletal morphology CLEARLY indicate this is a Racoon, there really is no debate on this anymore. There have been alot of opinions on what it is, however not a single qualified scientist has said it was anything other than a RACOON... they are ALL in agreement on this, yet the ignorant masses still take it upon themselves to hand out uninformed opinions on the matter.

Again, don&#039;t take my opinion either... listen to the experts... listen to the people who earn their paychecks by understanding and classifying animals for a LIVING... they ALL say it is a RACOON..

what SCIENTISTS think

http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2008/08/the_montauk_monster.php


Read Lago&#039;s comments in the below link for one of the best analysis of the &quot;creature&quot; on the internet.

http://urbanlegends.about.com/b/2008/08/01/montauk-monster-was-evidently-a-dead-raccoon.htm

Even Jeff Corwin says it is a racoon... what more do you want people???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carol.... go look at a turtle skeleton and tell me you still think it is a turtle.  Turtle shells are attached to the spinal column of a turtle, it is a part of their skeleton... they can&#039;t lose their shells unless they lose their skeleton.</p>
<p><a href="http://campus.murraystate.edu/academic/faculty/terry.derting/anatomyatlas/entireturtskelamy-becky.html" rel="nofollow">http://campus.murraystate.edu/academic/faculty/terry.derting/anatomyatlas/entireturtskelamy-becky.html</a></p>
<p>Turtles do not have teeth.</p>
<p>Turtles do not have external ears.</p>
<p>Turtles do not have hair.</p>
<p>Turtles do not have ribcages (their shell acts as the support structure)</p>
<p>I am literally astounded at how many people actually think it could even possibly be a turtle.</p>
<p>Dental morphology as well as skeletal morphology CLEARLY indicate this is a Racoon, there really is no debate on this anymore. There have been alot of opinions on what it is, however not a single qualified scientist has said it was anything other than a RACOON... they are ALL in agreement on this, yet the ignorant masses still take it upon themselves to hand out uninformed opinions on the matter.</p>
<p>Again, don&#039;t take my opinion either... listen to the experts... listen to the people who earn their paychecks by understanding and classifying animals for a LIVING... they ALL say it is a RACOON..</p>
<p>what SCIENTISTS think</p>
<p><a href="http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2008/08/the_montauk_monster.php" rel="nofollow">http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2008/08/the_montauk_monster.php</a></p>
<p>Read Lago&#039;s comments in the below link for one of the best analysis of the &#034;creature&#034; on the internet.</p>
<p><a href="http://urbanlegends.about.com/b/2008/08/01/montauk-monster-was-evidently-a-dead-raccoon.htm" rel="nofollow">http://urbanlegends.about.com/b/2008/08/01/montauk-monster-was-evidently-a-dead-raccoon.htm</a></p>
<p>Even Jeff Corwin says it is a racoon... what more do you want people???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franko</title>
		<link>http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2008/08/12/the-montauk-monster-a-marketing-gimmick/#comment-6470</link>
		<dc:creator>Franko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmarquee.wordpress.com/?p=114#comment-6470</guid>
		<description>The ManBearPig, Al Gore has murdered, stored in his Deep Freezer. 
A migrating Platipus,  exhausted, died due Climate Change ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ManBearPig, Al Gore has murdered, stored in his Deep Freezer.<br />
A migrating Platipus,  exhausted, died due Climate Change ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike S. from Texas</title>
		<link>http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2008/08/12/the-montauk-monster-a-marketing-gimmick/#comment-6459</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike S. from Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 05:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmarquee.wordpress.com/?p=114#comment-6459</guid>
		<description>http://www.animachina.com/images/whatisit/montauk_monster_is_raccoon.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.animachina.com/images/whatisit/montauk_monster_is_raccoon.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.animachina.com/images/whatisit/montauk_monster_is_raccoon.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2008/08/12/the-montauk-monster-a-marketing-gimmick/#comment-6452</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 22:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmarquee.wordpress.com/?p=114#comment-6452</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get people saying that its a dog. Since when does a dog have flippers? And a beak?  To me its clearly a turtle that somehow lost it&#039;s shell.  It has the beak and flippers of a turtle but what&#039;s shocking is the fact that we haven&#039;t seen one without the shell. That&#039;s my opinion anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t get people saying that its a dog. Since when does a dog have flippers? And a beak?  To me its clearly a turtle that somehow lost it&#039;s shell.  It has the beak and flippers of a turtle but what&#039;s shocking is the fact that we haven&#039;t seen one without the shell. That&#039;s my opinion anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maura</title>
		<link>http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2008/08/12/the-montauk-monster-a-marketing-gimmick/#comment-6449</link>
		<dc:creator>Maura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmarquee.wordpress.com/?p=114#comment-6449</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s manbearpig!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s manbearpig!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Dobbs</title>
		<link>http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2008/08/12/the-montauk-monster-a-marketing-gimmick/#comment-6421</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Dobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmarquee.wordpress.com/?p=114#comment-6421</guid>
		<description>Well Todd, I bet P.T. Barnum would be in the media business today.
He would probably own or manage a media company that might, theoretically, present an endless array of &quot;entertainment&quot; stories about current films and call these &quot;news&quot;.
Dark Knight much, CNN/Time Warner?
More likely, Barnum would pretend to run a legitimate, trustworthy news organization that would make money in shameless and crass ways...like...oh, I don&#039;t know...selling &quot;wacky / tragic&quot; headlines on T-shirts or something equally pedestrian.
Oh wait...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Todd, I bet P.T. Barnum would be in the media business today.<br />
He would probably own or manage a media company that might, theoretically, present an endless array of &#034;entertainment&#034; stories about current films and call these &#034;news&#034;.<br />
Dark Knight much, CNN/Time Warner?<br />
More likely, Barnum would pretend to run a legitimate, trustworthy news organization that would make money in shameless and crass ways...like...oh, I don&#039;t know...selling &#034;wacky / tragic&#034; headlines on T-shirts or something equally pedestrian.<br />
Oh wait...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://marquee.blogs.cnn.com/2008/08/12/the-montauk-monster-a-marketing-gimmick/#comment-6415</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 07:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cnnmarquee.wordpress.com/?p=114#comment-6415</guid>
		<description>Can there be a section next to Entertainment called &quot;Stupid?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can there be a section next to Entertainment called &#034;Stupid?&#034;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
